Sherman was just meant to be a cannon on treads which is all a tank should ever be

Panzer IV great early war just like CHI HA

StuG III later variants were the work horse of the Germans though.

Again underappreciated

Well those served more as artillery than tank destroyers

There really isn’t a best tank more like the best tank for the country using it

But wee good at both

Were*

they did build a bunch of them

They did.

If it didn’t sit so squat I’m sure it would have ONLY been mobile artillery instead of anti tank as well

When they upgraded the Panzer IV with high velocity, I'd say that was a pretty decent tank.

France made best tank in ww1, Renault FT

I do like T-34’s but still rather not want to crew one

T-34's were so crude

Renault was a good bunker buster

Renault FT’s were pretty revolutionary for 1918 standards

Well it wasn’t just literally a metal box on wheels with guns sticking out of it

CHAR B1 better than panzer 4

Doubt

Fun fact the Germans tried to use Renault FT’s for street fighting in Paris 1944

French tanks are under rated

Tbh they used PNZ II's and III's most of the war.

Neat

I finished deltarune

Purty good

Rommel in his memoirs wrote that it was a good tank for him.

Rommel was great, to bad hitler had him killed

The commander only had to traverse the turret, load, aim and fire the gun, and command the tank and other tanks if there was a radio

Japanese tanks fit their application perfectly until america got involved

They fit because they were an island nation, used exactly what designed for.

But enough man, we'll get pulled

<#470643162613022731>

Fair enough

Just saying, man.

I agree and understand, no argument

Wtf

Dunno

@PAS CANADIEN quit fucking dogs man

Better or worse than Canadian, cant tell