Message from @Tea

Discord ID: 509067425745076236


2018-11-05 18:09:24 UTC  

I prefer the KwK 42 over tits

2018-11-05 18:09:51 UTC  

The great war tanks were more impressive

2018-11-05 18:09:52 UTC  

I mean when you start building tanks to kill other tanks first and foremost over any other task I think that’s when it starts to get a bit pointless

2018-11-05 18:10:11 UTC  

Only if we had the 7.5 cm L 100 gun that thing was as long as the fucking panther alone

2018-11-05 18:10:16 UTC  

KwK 42 was underrated

2018-11-05 18:10:32 UTC  

A tiger could take out a T-34 with ease and shrug of shells but I mean it was slow and clunky as hell

2018-11-05 18:10:48 UTC  

It was also unreliable and not numerous enough to make a difference.

2018-11-05 18:10:51 UTC  

*laughs in 8.8 cm*

2018-11-05 18:10:55 UTC  

Dat drive train dough

2018-11-05 18:11:06 UTC  

How scarry was this in 1917?

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/418492114679365643/509067148728205312/download_7.jpeg

2018-11-05 18:11:10 UTC  

PZ IV > panther, tiger

2018-11-05 18:11:11 UTC  

Sherman best tank

2018-11-05 18:11:22 UTC  

For 1917 probably very

2018-11-05 18:11:27 UTC  

Sherman is the best overall tank

2018-11-05 18:11:28 UTC  

Sherman FireFly.

2018-11-05 18:11:28 UTC  

sherman best overal tank of war

2018-11-05 18:11:51 UTC  

firefly is only good if it has 3 other cromwells/comets/shermans with it

2018-11-05 18:11:55 UTC  

Sherman was just meant to be a cannon on treads which is all a tank should ever be

2018-11-05 18:11:59 UTC  

Panzer IV great early war just like CHI HA

2018-11-05 18:12:05 UTC  

StuG III later variants were the work horse of the Germans though.

2018-11-05 18:12:12 UTC  

Again underappreciated

2018-11-05 18:12:23 UTC  

Well those served more as artillery than tank destroyers

2018-11-05 18:12:26 UTC  

There really isn’t a best tank more like the best tank for the country using it

2018-11-05 18:12:27 UTC  

But wee good at both

2018-11-05 18:12:30 UTC  

Were*

2018-11-05 18:12:31 UTC  

they did build a bunch of them

2018-11-05 18:12:37 UTC  

They did.

2018-11-05 18:13:14 UTC  

If it didn’t sit so squat I’m sure it would have ONLY been mobile artillery instead of anti tank as well

2018-11-05 18:13:22 UTC  

When they upgraded the Panzer IV with high velocity, I'd say that was a pretty decent tank.

2018-11-05 18:13:30 UTC  

France made best tank in ww1, Renault FT

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/418492114679365643/509067753257435136/FT-17-argonne-1918.gif

2018-11-05 18:13:35 UTC  

I do like T-34’s but still rather not want to crew one

2018-11-05 18:13:46 UTC  

T-34's were so crude

2018-11-05 18:13:58 UTC  

Renault was a good bunker buster

2018-11-05 18:14:04 UTC  

Renault FT’s were pretty revolutionary for 1918 standards

2018-11-05 18:14:48 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/418492114679365643/509068080601890848/welcome.webm

2018-11-05 18:15:11 UTC  

Well it wasn’t just literally a metal box on wheels with guns sticking out of it

2018-11-05 18:15:13 UTC  

CHAR B1 better than panzer 4

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/418492114679365643/509068186319061003/300px-Renault_B1_bisTanks_in_the_Musee_des_Blindes_France_pic-9.jpg

2018-11-05 18:15:38 UTC  

Doubt

2018-11-05 18:15:38 UTC  

Fun fact the Germans tried to use Renault FT’s for street fighting in Paris 1944

2018-11-05 18:15:53 UTC  

French tanks are under rated

2018-11-05 18:16:02 UTC  

Tbh they used PNZ II's and III's most of the war.