@Kriley74 Yeee

@Ruger Oh why do you say that? Air power?

Ye

And mechs

Yeah makes sense.

Mostly because conflicts are becoming more insurgency surppression and soft power projection

aka where tanks aren't great

That's it

mechs are decades away at best

We ban aircraft

Ground combat vehicles will still be a thing, but the days of direct vehicle combat outside of guerilla/dirt-farmer environments is probably over, yeah

It's more of

Give them guns

Probably going to see more vehicles like the AJAX and Warriors replaxing MBTs.

And present it wasn't us

RICE IS DONE YES

It'll never be over, but you'll see a change more towards armored gun carries and armored cars than proper tanks

Especially when the era of railguns starts

Railguns are still really far out

On anything but navy ships

Yes lets all get ridbof our tanks.....laughs in russian.

Ye

I mean, it kind of has already.

25 MW per shot I'm pretty sure

Nah not really

Lol new Russian T14 with 152mm gun can literally shoot nukes

It won't be a discrete 'hey tanks are obslete now scrap em all' but a more of 'nah, we never use these things, just keep updating them for the next 40 years'

***bias***

Railguns destroy thier own barrels quite quickly and need a massive power supply.

railguns arent practical

Make emm coal powered

at all

The power supply and rail wear are the big issue

Best we got on land is like 2 or 3 semi trucks in size for a single railgun

I imagine we'll just relegate the Abrams in a similar way to how we use the A10. Shock and awe work-horse.

That is how it's used now tbh

one of the things fallout 3 did that was cool and good was using these things as the basis of an enclave super weapon

We need mechs

Plasma guns

Are a thing

Even then for such a big target a semi truck is really vulnerable