There’s nothing in the actual fossil record to even suggest such a thing. The fake cartoon record, with mixes of ape, pig, and human bones, isn’t a record.

@Derek Nelson your telling me the fossil record is a mix of pig and monkey bones

The fake cartoon one, yes.

uh, hi? i'm new

this seems kinda intresting, what is the debate about?

There is no debate.

A fossil record where humans and apes share a common ancestor doesn’t exist.

@Derek Nelson prove your so called space daddy

!mute @Master Oogway

Not only are there not millions. There are literally none.

Bones that have been discovered, have either been entirely ape dna, or entirely human dna. No in betweens.

Well for fosiles to form it needs to be under very specific circumstances. And we have so much evidence for the "between species" so we don't need millions of fosiles @Derek Nelson

I don’t see evidence supporting species in between humans and apes. Perhaps we can agree to disagree? Have a good day.

Well we can clearly see the similarities between us and primates and that allone shows that it's very possible we chare an common ancestor with primates

We share a common creator. That I will concede to.

is that a joke

simple

tens of thousands of yers ago when all you had was your body as tools people who didn;t have the tools to survive died so their genes were not passed on but people who did did pass their genes on changing the genes of the people alive otherwise how could some races like neanderthal get wiped out if we were exactly the same

and by the way St Augustine of hippo widely considered one of the greatesst christian thinkers did not believe in creationsim

That or that the earth was flat

or that it is supposedly 600 years old

How convenient of you to completely ignore this isn’t a topic about genes changing. You need a way to add genes for evolution to even be possible. (It’s not possible, so this concludes this riveting discussion.)

duplicating a gene and changing it creates a new gene

@Derek Nelson have you heard of cell devition?

Changing an already existing gene, is the same gene. @Σ5

Gene mutation is also not a substitute for additional genes.

Heard of mutations?

well its random

Spare me word play. You guys can’t explain it without twisting words.

let gene Y = [UGACCCAU]
dupolication mutation
Y and Y'
you now have [UGACCCAU][UGACCCAU]

do some letter based mutations

You do not have a way to add new genes.

Period.

[UGACGGAU][UGACCCAA]
you now have 2 DIFRENT genes

Go get your Nobel prize then.

gene duplication is known to occure

and letter based mutations

Duplication is the same gene.