Preventing a strawman is useful.

I want you to define it so I am not debating my definition of such.

That would not be beneficial for you.

the one who has yet to provide 1 shred of evidence

btw edward jenner was a master mason lol nice try

part of the royal society

nice bias source

And you are apart of the Anti-Vax community, though I wouldn't use that to throw out your arguments in their face, either.

Even a broken clock is right once a day, after all.

Be it whatever you think of Edwards

But please

De elaborate what you mean

When you say

"double blind placebo"

I am asking for it in your words, and how I shall agree to address it henceforth.

do you know wtf a placebo is in the first place????

and how the test is even used???

https://www.jameslindlibrary.org/articles/edward-jenners-1798-report-of-challenge-experiments-demonstrating-the-protective-effects-of-cowpox-against-smallpox/

This is a reasonable entry

Aha!

Vax is bad

It was 1798

I knew it

It was either that or 1796 when those specific experiments were done

Cancer, as it was, was plenty prolific by the 1700s

As was Cholera

Vaccination is bad

and there is proof they are injecting you with cancers

You know what Cancer is, right? How is that precisely injected?

It cant be

hes dumb

It is, in a sense, a replication error.

a genetically engineered ones to make them more tumrigenic

oml

Again, how does that induce Cancer?

Mans kids are gonna die by the flu

I'd like a step-by-step breakdown on how a liquid is inherently cancerous

A nonliving liquid at that.

Hes a flat earther dont listen