Message from @Thinky
Discord ID: 662150371745071116
I don't wish to take out of context your argument, after all.
are you fking kidding me right now
Preventing a strawman is useful.
I want you to define it so I am not debating my definition of such.
That would not be beneficial for you.
the one who has yet to provide 1 shred of evidence
btw edward jenner was a master mason lol nice try
part of the royal society
nice bias source
And you are apart of the Anti-Vax community, though I wouldn't use that to throw out your arguments in their face, either.
Even a broken clock is right once a day, after all.
Be it whatever you think of Edwards
But please
De elaborate what you mean
When you say
"double blind placebo"
I am asking for it in your words, and how I shall agree to address it henceforth.
do you know wtf a placebo is in the first place????
and how the test is even used???
This is a reasonable entry
Aha!
Vax is bad
It was 1798
I knew it
It was either that or 1796 when those specific experiments were done
Cancer, as it was, was plenty prolific by the 1700s
As was Cholera
Vaccination is bad
and there is proof they are injecting you with cancers
You know what Cancer is, right? How is that precisely injected?
It cant be
hes dumb
It is, in a sense, a replication error.
a genetically engineered ones to make them more tumrigenic
oml
Again, how does that induce Cancer?
Mans kids are gonna die by the flu
I'd like a step-by-step breakdown on how a liquid is inherently cancerous