Message from @Wretch
Discord ID: 662149487892103179
If Anti-Vax in general was as thorough you may find an easier time breaking into the "mainstream" with such ideas.
After all, trust but verify.
And importantly, make sure you don't contaminate the samples
number 1 has never been done
EVER
It has, a fair few times.
I believe one of the first was even in 1798
Following the first Smallpox trials
no it has not and they give a lame excuse why too lol
At least, the person was wholly blind
obvoiusly you have not done your research
never been a double blind placebo ever
I think you need to look a bit more into Edwards Jenner
And his experiments
Initial and otherwise.
yawn
Alright, I'll bite.
Define for me
"double blind placebo"
In your terms
I don't wish to take out of context your argument, after all.
are you fking kidding me right now
Preventing a strawman is useful.
I want you to define it so I am not debating my definition of such.
That would not be beneficial for you.
the one who has yet to provide 1 shred of evidence
btw edward jenner was a master mason lol nice try
part of the royal society
nice bias source
And you are apart of the Anti-Vax community, though I wouldn't use that to throw out your arguments in their face, either.
Even a broken clock is right once a day, after all.
Be it whatever you think of Edwards
But please
De elaborate what you mean
When you say
"double blind placebo"
I am asking for it in your words, and how I shall agree to address it henceforth.
do you know wtf a placebo is in the first place????
and how the test is even used???