Message from @a n n a

Discord ID: 662164443047788574


2020-01-02 04:40:47 UTC  

tired of debating with ppl who know nothing about what they are debating

2020-01-02 04:40:57 UTC  

they know what they are told

2020-01-02 04:41:01 UTC  

by their priests

2020-01-02 04:41:09 UTC  

vaccines are horrible

2020-01-02 04:41:14 UTC  

makes the joke svt40

2020-01-02 04:41:15 UTC  

they inject horrible stuff into u

2020-01-02 04:41:26 UTC  

shows his ignorance to the topic

2020-01-02 04:43:33 UTC  

brb

2020-01-02 04:44:19 UTC  

i hate vaccines

2020-01-02 04:59:58 UTC  

approximately 71.6% of the population were vaccinated in 2017 and approximately 20% died by cancer in 2017, 9.6 million people died of cancer. which is 0.13 percent of the population, whilst in 1990, 5.7 million people died of cancer which is 0.076 percent of the population, the percentage of people who were vaccinated in 1990 is 61% which is with 5 vaccines, so it could be argued that either the measles 2nd dose or rotavirus do in fact cause cancer. I don't have a stand on either side I just found it interesting. People may also argue that it is linked to population and the amount of other carcinogens that are available. I think my stats are right I'm not sure.

2020-01-02 05:02:46 UTC  

i hate vaccines but i must say, i don't think they cause cancer

2020-01-02 05:02:50 UTC  

cancer is not spread like taht

2020-01-02 05:02:57 UTC  

*that

2020-01-02 05:17:12 UTC  

Cancer is indeed, a replication issue.

2020-01-02 05:17:36 UTC  

Injecting it requires some living cellular form to attach itself and restructure one's DNA

2020-01-02 05:17:53 UTC  

That is at least if we are injecting it through a liquid

2020-01-02 05:18:36 UTC  

Of note Citizen, I am more than willing to discuss such matters, I just get a bit frustrated when being hit with Ad Hominems

2020-01-02 05:18:44 UTC  

Which serve no one any benefit, in truth.

2020-01-02 05:19:54 UTC  

Even if I may disagree with you, I still see you as a person who is capable of thought, all of us are. I probably just happen to have a different perspective than you, not that such is good or bad.

2020-01-02 05:20:00 UTC  

But different, indeed.

2020-01-02 05:25:05 UTC  

who are you talking to

2020-01-02 05:25:51 UTC  

The latter bit? Potentially to anyone.

2020-01-02 05:25:57 UTC  

Originally though, to Citizen Z

2020-01-02 05:28:24 UTC  

I am very much interested in discussing a variety of things, of course Aeronautics and Aerospace is more my gig, but I would prefer that whoever I am talking to that we hold some form of basic mutual respect for each other.

2020-01-02 05:28:31 UTC  

That is mainly what I am looking for.

2020-01-02 12:49:19 UTC  

the mrc-5 cell line is what they call a immortal cell line. meaning it replicates its self and that is how they are transferring traits from that cell line to you and your kids, their kids etc https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MRC-5

2020-01-02 12:50:51 UTC  

in the 60s when they got the tissue sample that is being used in the mrc-5

2020-01-02 16:12:22 UTC  

7) The most central ring represents the SV (Structural Variants) inference in the exon and splicing regions. TRA (orange, translocations), INS (green, insertions), DEL (deletions, gray), DUP (duplications, pink) and INV (inversions, blue).
6) the sixth circle represents the CNV inference (copy number variants). Red means DNA sequences gain and green means loss.
5) The fifth ring represents the SNP proportion in homozygosity (orange) and heterozygosity (grey) in histogram layout.
4) The fourth ring (green) represents the SNP density in scatter chart layout.
3) The third ring (black) represents the INDELs density in scatter chart layout.
2) The second ring (light blue) represents the reads covering in histogram layout.
1) The external circle (the first circle) is the chromosome number.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/552285797038948364/662327335692795926/corvelva-mrc5-2.jpg

2020-01-02 16:13:58 UTC  

The human reference genome was found to be matched by 99.76% reads from vaccine DNA, that means nearly in all its entirety. The human fetal DNA presented in this vaccine is a single entire genome, that means the vaccine contains genomic DNA with all the chromosomes of a male individual (in fact MRC-5 originates from a male fetus).

2020-01-02 20:21:25 UTC  

Hey everyone, **The HighWire with Del Bigtree** just posted a video! Go check it out!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82KJGSLT2e4

2020-01-03 01:43:50 UTC  

2020-01-03 11:52:30 UTC  

these antivax guys are like "heyy i win a debate against a _regular_ person because i know a lot because everyday nonstop i read about vaccine antithesis",

2020-01-03 11:56:29 UTC  

These pro poisoners are like "hey i win a debate against a smart person cuz i eat tidepods and munch on crayons all day"

2020-01-03 12:00:56 UTC  

for this MRC5 stuff, I have a question for you Citizen Z, will you take medication for your pain

2020-01-03 12:01:12 UTC  

or will you get insulin lets say

2020-01-03 12:01:37 UTC  

or what if your kid suffers from growth retardation in the future, will you get hormones for him/her
I also dont have to even mention the fact that cell-lines can be used for decades, they do not have to use aborted fetuses to get new cell-lines when they already have cultured cells.

2020-01-03 12:09:10 UTC  

also this cancer-vaccine correlations you guys made are so funny, what about the environmental changes, what about processed food, what about that people do less exercise, what about that our lives have changed drastically in this 200 years.

2020-01-03 12:10:41 UTC  

even though you prove that cancer has a relation with vaccines invention, correlation=/=causation