Message from @a n n a
Discord ID: 662158826522542096
You do not make the conclusion and then draw up rudimentary data to say it supports it.
seems you have done zero research
talking out your ass
you didnt even know wtf sv40 was
Far from it, I talk out other orifices.
yawn
tired of debating with ppl who know nothing about what they are debating
they know what they are told
by their priests
vaccines are horrible
makes the joke svt40
they inject horrible stuff into u
shows his ignorance to the topic
brb
i hate vaccines
approximately 71.6% of the population were vaccinated in 2017 and approximately 20% died by cancer in 2017, 9.6 million people died of cancer. which is 0.13 percent of the population, whilst in 1990, 5.7 million people died of cancer which is 0.076 percent of the population, the percentage of people who were vaccinated in 1990 is 61% which is with 5 vaccines, so it could be argued that either the measles 2nd dose or rotavirus do in fact cause cancer. I don't have a stand on either side I just found it interesting. People may also argue that it is linked to population and the amount of other carcinogens that are available. I think my stats are right I'm not sure.
cancer is not spread like taht
*that
Cancer is indeed, a replication issue.
Injecting it requires some living cellular form to attach itself and restructure one's DNA
That is at least if we are injecting it through a liquid
Of note Citizen, I am more than willing to discuss such matters, I just get a bit frustrated when being hit with Ad Hominems
Which serve no one any benefit, in truth.
Even if I may disagree with you, I still see you as a person who is capable of thought, all of us are. I probably just happen to have a different perspective than you, not that such is good or bad.
But different, indeed.
who are you talking to
The latter bit? Potentially to anyone.
Originally though, to Citizen Z
I am very much interested in discussing a variety of things, of course Aeronautics and Aerospace is more my gig, but I would prefer that whoever I am talking to that we hold some form of basic mutual respect for each other.
That is mainly what I am looking for.
the mrc-5 cell line is what they call a immortal cell line. meaning it replicates its self and that is how they are transferring traits from that cell line to you and your kids, their kids etc https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MRC-5
in the 60s when they got the tissue sample that is being used in the mrc-5
7) The most central ring represents the SV (Structural Variants) inference in the exon and splicing regions. TRA (orange, translocations), INS (green, insertions), DEL (deletions, gray), DUP (duplications, pink) and INV (inversions, blue).
6) the sixth circle represents the CNV inference (copy number variants). Red means DNA sequences gain and green means loss.
5) The fifth ring represents the SNP proportion in homozygosity (orange) and heterozygosity (grey) in histogram layout.
4) The fourth ring (green) represents the SNP density in scatter chart layout.
3) The third ring (black) represents the INDELs density in scatter chart layout.
2) The second ring (light blue) represents the reads covering in histogram layout.
1) The external circle (the first circle) is the chromosome number.
The human reference genome was found to be matched by 99.76% reads from vaccine DNA, that means nearly in all its entirety. The human fetal DNA presented in this vaccine is a single entire genome, that means the vaccine contains genomic DNA with all the chromosomes of a male individual (in fact MRC-5 originates from a male fetus).