Message from @RadRhys
Discord ID: 651236543717179394
They are specifically referring to this study, https://www.pnas.org/content/113/36/10019
If you cut down a forest, unless it is quickly replanted or you control the environment, it will cease to retain its moisture and the presence of chlorophyll necessarily decreases overall.
As I said before, there are more factors. Here is a study talking about another limiting factor: nitrogen. https://www.pnas.org/content/107/45/19368
Not only does man-caused global warming not exist, but it is also the scientific hoax of the century. And 90 leading Italian scientists say so.
https://www.afa.net/the-stand/culture/2019/07/90-scientists-global-warming-is-a-total-hoax/
😂
LOLOLOLOL
I don’t get it, they’re right
Trump stands in the way of good environmental reform
Regional raw data is insufficient
All of them did*
“For at least three decades scientists and activists have been warning that the world is on the verge of a global warming crisis”
https://newspunch.com/12-climate-change-apocalypse-warnings-from-30-years-didnt-happen/
Have y’all never heard of a wave cloud?
have tyou ever seen those beams being sent around on radar. that stuff is pretty weird
“What a disgusting lie!
He has NOTHING to back up that number.
It-is-a-complete-lie!”
https://nworeport.me/2019/12/03/junk-science-jumps-the-shark-un-secretary-general-says-global-warming-has-claimed-7-million-lives-where/
@Wretch Always the same BS from these people.
From your article
"There are virtually no actual measures of anything including temperature and precipitation, but especially GHG. What they do is produce data in a separate computer model and then use it as real data in another model."
Global cooling was never seriously considered, it was just a media fad. Climate science was also in its infancy.
climate science? LOL I don't think so. Climate tea reading is more accurate.
ah, so this is where the infamous indio resides
If you actually listened to what she said, you should understand that it was a literal translation
It would imply execution in English, but that was clearly not intended. She even explicitly stated that in her apology
Why would that be an accident
What’s more believable...
A rich, 16 year old girl saying we should kill government officials
or
A literal translation having different meanings in different languages and cultures
What did she mean?
Why would she apologize if she meant something else
The proper translation is “to put one on the spot”
And since when is an apology an admission of guilt or a sign of weakness?
“That's what happens when you improvise speeches in a second language. But of course I apologise if anyone misunderstood this,”