@RadRhys you need to talk about one thing at a time

First of all. When a plant has increased CO2, it needs less water.

Increased co2 will make plants more draught tolerant

You dont need a surplus of other resources besides co2 to increase plant productivity.

It can be soley an increase in co2 and the plant will become a super plant (comparably)

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/08/30/study-plants-do-better-during-drought-thanks-to-increased-co2-levels/

They are specifically referring to this study, https://www.pnas.org/content/113/36/10019
If you cut down a forest, unless it is quickly replanted or you control the environment, it will cease to retain its moisture and the presence of chlorophyll necessarily decreases overall.

As I said before, there are more factors. Here is a study talking about another limiting factor: nitrogen. https://www.pnas.org/content/107/45/19368

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/scientists-dishonest-or-afraid

https://twitter.com/liberalnotlefty/status/1198030589078757376?s=20

https://www.npr.org/2019/11/24/779136094/climate-planners-turn-to-virtual-reality-and-hope-seeing-is-believing

Not only does man-caused global warming not exist, but it is also the scientific hoax of the century. And 90 leading Italian scientists say so.

https://www.afa.net/the-stand/culture/2019/07/90-scientists-global-warming-is-a-total-hoax/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2019-11-07/trump-withdraw-paris-climate-accord%3f_amp=true

😂

LOLOLOLOL

I don’t get it, they’re right

Trump stands in the way of good environmental reform

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-11-27-no-climate-warming-in-the-us-since-2005.html

Regional raw data is insufficient

https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/news/recent-global-surface-warming-hiatus

All of them did*

“For at least three decades scientists and activists have been warning that the world is on the verge of a global warming crisis”

https://newspunch.com/12-climate-change-apocalypse-warnings-from-30-years-didnt-happen/

http://humansarefree.com/2016/09/over-30000-scientists-declare-climate.html

https://humansarefree.com/2019/12/hurricane-destroyed-by-haarp.html

https://humansarefree.com/2017/09/nasa-accidentally-shows-evidence-of-large-scale-weather-manipulation-in-satellite-photos.html

Have y’all never heard of a wave cloud?

They’ve existed long before radio was a thing

have tyou ever seen those beams being sent around on radar. that stuff is pretty weird

“What a disgusting lie!
He has NOTHING to back up that number.
It-is-a-complete-lie!”

https://nworeport.me/2019/12/03/junk-science-jumps-the-shark-un-secretary-general-says-global-warming-has-claimed-7-million-lives-where/

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/why-apocalyptic-claims-about-climate-change-are-wrong

https://humansarefree.com/2019/12/deliberate-deception-to-demonize-co2.html

@Wretch Always the same BS from these people.

From your article

"There are virtually no actual measures of anything including temperature and precipitation, but especially GHG. What they do is produce data in a separate computer model and then use it as real data in another model."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSDLRm3jhc8

Global cooling was never seriously considered, it was just a media fad. Climate science was also in its infancy.

climate science? LOL I don't think so. Climate tea reading is more accurate.

ah, so this is where the infamous indio resides

https://youtu.be/IbT1WkgwPRI

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/greta-threatens-put-world-leaders-against-wall-if-they-refuse-fight-climate-change

If you actually listened to what she said, you should understand that it was a literal translation

It would imply execution in English, but that was clearly not intended. She even explicitly stated that in her apology

Why would that be an accident

What’s more believable...

A rich, 16 year old girl saying we should kill government officials
or
A literal translation having different meanings in different languages and cultures