1 week left until the world ends

It was nice knowing you

😂

They hype up this bullshit.

To try and scare people.

Most of our world runs off of fear FYI.

Ah shit, the Earth is gonna end again.

It ended throughout the decade. I'd figure they'd take a break by now.

@🎃Oakheart🎃 you must provide evidence that we are significant

It is possible that we are significant
It is possible that we are insignificant
But I can't believe either untill I see evidence
Also I don't see how us lacking a sense of cosmic significance gives "them" power over us

When they get you to affirm to yourself that you are guilty for destroying the earth and they can save you, they have gained power over you.

Who is “they”

The people trying to push guilt down your throat. Politicians, entertainment industry, science community, education system and the mainstream media.

https://youtu.be/cdFdGaGninU

Why a train? Was it a coal car or something?

Bc trains are the most efficient nethod of transportation besides walking or biking

Coal train

Clean coal

https://youtu.be/B3ZE0vn86jM

“Clean” coal

That’s only a term used relative to unprocessed coal. It still is far worse than oil, natural gas, and especially wind or nuclear

Seems fine to me when i turn my lights on

1960's - Oil gone in 10 years

1970's - another ice age in 10 years

1980's - acid rain will destroy all crops in 10 years

1990's - The ozone layer will be destroyed in 10 years

2000's - The icecaps will be gone in 10 years

None happened, but all resulted in more taxes.

The new world

India is a superpower

Brace for nuclear war, they’re coming

@Citizen Z are any of these claims from a published, peer reviewed paper?

peer review doesnt mean anything

https://newrepublic.com/article/135921/science-suffering-peer-reviews-big-problems

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/

nuclear war threat is just more power they have over you. they arent going to nuke you. nukes dont exist.

This does not say peer review is meaningless in any possible understanding

In fact, the paper explicitly states that it’s useful

https://humansarefree.com/2020/01/evergreen-cia-chemtrails.html

Scientists are human. Scientists have a vested interest in promoting their work, often for status and further research funding, although sometimes for direct financial gain. This can lead to selective reporting of results and occasionally, exaggeration. Peer review is not infallible: journal editors might favor positive findings and newsworthiness. Multiple, independent sources of evidence and replication are much more convincing.

Nobody ever said peer review is infallible, it is merely another barrier to weed out as many false conclusions and mistakes to an arbitrarily decided threshold deemed acceptable

The article you put up is literally just a single dude, and it can’t even be verified if any of this happened

There’s a link in the article talking about finding out what’s in the chemtrails themselves (which they only show lab results, not collection or anything else), and it uses the consistent results of 2 samples from 2 different locations as an argument in favor of chemtrailsl, and then with a third sample that has wildly different results, they say that’s more representative of what’s actually being sprayed. There isn’t even a control. Humansarefree is a joke.

https://humansarefree.com/2018/04/rain-tests-confirm-yet-again-geoengineering-aluminum-barium-titanium-iron-sulfur-pour-from-the-sky.html

NASA has a section on their website and they talk about chem trails. Sometimes they call them "Vapor Tracers".

Chems used are said to be aluminum, lithium amd barium.