@Jondar02 Can you find a chart where it shows how many people were vaccinated from 1940 to 1970? I've been looking for a while and can't find any from that period. I wonder how many people took that vaccine when the virus got wiped out, your hypothesis would be true if 60%> took the vaccine when it got licensed. This is just anecdotal evidence, take it with a grain of salt but I've asked my dad about this and he told me he never took any vaccines nor was instructed to when he was in his teenage years to adult life.

I think the data is being purposefully hidden because it will destroy the whole narrative of ''vaccines wiped out all diseases'' if we know how many people actually took the vaccine at that time.

great point

@Flat Earth PhD you see no problem here?

I can find a problem with every study

It's a survey. And not even a full study, keyword being "pilot"

we take what we can get in an industry controlled by big pharma

where the CDC has circa 56 vaccine patents

I've been through graduate school. I've seen how the system works.

Kudos to them for conducting this study

A survey is not medically accurate in any way.

you're stuck on the medical industry

my father is a retired physician of over 40yrs

My mother is a physician.

who supports the entire medical industry?

@Jondar02 so do you have a medical trial to prove vacines are beneficial

starting from schools

they dont trial medicines on children!!!

@Flat Earth PhD yes, she teaches herself and works in a university hospital

great. then she should know.

https://deeprootsathome.com/vaccinated-unvaccinated-healthier/

This article is shocking.

gonna put this out there, but perfect is subjective, so nothing can be objectively perfect, thus "perfect" is meaningless due to nothing being able to be truely perfect

Idk how I feel about vaxx.

Easy

Should feel like we r just looking for full transparency

Obviously we arent against something if it was perfectly healthy and proven to not cause problems for ppl

Otherwise as of now. Caution is whats best

like i always say, it's history repeating itself, the first 50-100 or so years after a medicine is pushed, its seen as a holy drug and any problems covered up

like anti-biotics used to litterly be basically poison but people scarfed them down like some gift from god

what i really want to see is a study that examine infant DNA before being vaccinated and then after, to see if the claims of vaccines altering DNA has any merit

Exactly

But the pharmaceutical companies will not do this because if it proves vaxx are bad, they will lose money.

They dont want to solve your problem, they just want to keep prescribing shit to help with symptoms.

Solving the problem at it's root cause means they lose out on money.

yea, thats why stuff like this normally lasts a few generations before people call them out.
Normally, after being called out they fix the problem (Aka, like the poison anti-biotics being replaced with smething safe) because normally they had a good idea, they just didnt take the time to develop it into something safe before selling it

i think vaccines are a very good idea, but they are being sold too early into development

@Jondar02 https://youtu.be/28mtauUXn00

No one ever said that

Who

When