How does it disprove such?

what

wtf

@Logrian how

because they assumed the medium was tougher, more dense, an its not

what

when you go down it's the crust

If i am going to tell you that deep down its like molton i need to know the medium in which i am sending the waves thru, right?

The medium is a fluid

By definition of fluid mechanics

ok

no, the crust is not a fluid, lmao

Below the mantle is.

Such was your question, no?

we dont know what that is, we cannot dig that far, an the assumed density is wrong

You assume it is wrong.

Anyways, here is the given definition

“A substance that deforms continuously under the application of a shear stress, regardless of the magnitude of the shear stress.”

Can you explain how they know the medium the waves pass through from the crust to the mantle an the depths?

Different mediums transmit signals in different ways, if we were to penetrate the Earth with a certain signal the way it is returned and the fashion in which it arrives can be used to back-track the mediums it passed through.

Evidently, such is also the way RADAR and Laser-Rangefinders work

Just on a different scale.

uhhhm

lulz

So, I have an interesting argument to snap up

whatchu got, nesopo?

So, technically we all see. Some people say the Earth is flat and all that. They're wrong in my perspective. But look what happens when I say this.

Since oxegen and Nitrogen is magnetic it can stick to the core of the planet because of it's gravitational and magnetic interactions.

The water is also gravitationally attracted.

When I said this I got banned on the other server, pretty much.

Wheres the Nitrogen from?

atmos.

I mean Earth does have nitrogen right?

As a gas?

yea

what creates it?

Since it's composition

No idea, I haven't gotten into that

ah

you need to

But we know for sure there is nitrogen,oxegyn,co2

what part of air is nitrogen?