@I, AM... bebé yoda you can be a truther about some things and not about other things.

I dont understand :< @SiliconBassist

I could just as easily say, “this person calls themself a truther but they don’t believe our government is run by ETs.”

Basically, you have truthers for different topics, and they don’t all agree with each other about every conspiracy theory.

So you can have like 9/11 truthers who are globe earthers and antivaxxers who are globe earthers. @I, AM... bebé yoda

But they’re still truthers in the context of some conspiracy theories

Just not all of them

Classism

I thought truther meant you believe in the truth

But guess truther means you believe in any conspiracy theory

So basically, nobody is a truther, because nobody is “right” about everything?

Yes

That could be a way to see it

Well shi t

My a rse cheeks are burning, so the earth is clearly a globe

<:butthurt:507983822244151306>

ok

because the space shuttle is outside the atmosphere?

@Derek Nelson “33” 😉

Yeah. When numbers like 25,000 mph are physically impossible to achieve on earth, just throw up a ‘33’ spell, and the brainwashed eat it up anyway.

I really dislike how people call the space shuttle the fastest plane or whatever

Its not a plane

it only hits that speed on reentry

depending how vague you want to be, you can call it a spaceplane @The_chickenmaster

It's designed to (barely) maneuver in air

You can also define it as a trike coz it has 3 weels but sure

yes

it does have tricycle landing gear

like every other modern aircraft

in nearly all aspects of its design, it's a plane

you can trace its history back to this program https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerospaceplane

"The vehicle began re-entry by firing the Orbital maneuvering system engines, while flying upside down, backside first, in the opposite direction to orbital motion for approximately three minutes, which reduced the Shuttle's velocity by about 200 mph (322 km/h)."

I forgot how wacky the space shuttle maneuvers are

So

buttons

@Giorno Giovanna Here's the first irrefutable fact, in an interview Neil Armstrong was asked how did space look like? He responded with, it looked like a deep black, skip to 21:46 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEE7OPKLhaM His eyes should've seen every single star, I understand why his camera didn't catch the stars but his eyes should've seen them. This is because the moons atmosphere is almost non-present and also by the testimony of ISS astronaut who said that every time they peeked out the window they saw space full of stars .

I have 3 clips I want to show you, I will find them wait a second.

which all show signs of graphic manipulation