When the image came from a camera that did a 360 degree panorama, and saw nothing but flat at 120,000 feet, when globers claim you can see earth curve at the surface is ludicrous.

did this camera use a fisheye lens

Tbh, I’m not sure. Even if it did. When the camera is level, that’s the most accurate shape of the earth. Since we already know that you can’t turn a convex shape concave with a wide angle lens.

Who’s we

People who acknowledge reality.

And not superimpose fake imagery over verifiable repetition.

the camera being level has nothing to do whether or not there's distortion

Well

There would be distortion but not at the horizon

that's only if the horizon is the target

Well yeah

Oh

Just ignore me

Nice strawman

It’s not a strawman.

You genuinely believe fake photos of earth.

Not fisheye lens ones

That’s what almost every photo of a sphere earth is if it isn’t CGI.

Every single time.

You make assumptions about what pictures we think don’t have a fisheye effect

Okay

Every single time.

Did I say there wasn’t a fisheye effect?

Don’t make assumptions

Why the hell do fisheye lenses have to be used for the horizon to generate what you want?

@Superiorna_Artiljerija That’s not the argument.

You’re not listening to me

@Superiorna_Artiljerija The argument is, show a convex surface turn concave. (The opposite direction.)

Like what we see with these other high altitude wide angle lens videos do.

I never said that the high altitude videos don’t use a fisheye lense, so don’t strawman

You’re not answering why they are using those.

That’s not the point. My point is stop strawmanning

It’s not a strawman. When that’s what they are using to convince the masses.

I am not the masses

You’re not using anything.

Show me curve that doesn’t use fisheye, or CGI.