Not fisheye lens ones
That’s what almost every photo of a sphere earth is if it isn’t CGI.
Every single time.
You make assumptions about what pictures we think don’t have a fisheye effect
Okay
Did I say there wasn’t a fisheye effect?
Don’t make assumptions
Why the hell do fisheye lenses have to be used for the horizon to generate what you want?
@Superiorna_Artiljerija That’s not the argument.
You’re not listening to me
@Superiorna_Artiljerija The argument is, show a convex surface turn concave. (The opposite direction.)
Like what we see with these other high altitude wide angle lens videos do.
I never said that the high altitude videos don’t use a fisheye lense, so don’t strawman
You’re not answering why they are using those.
That’s not the point. My point is stop strawmanning
It’s not a strawman. When that’s what they are using to convince the masses.
I am not the masses
You’re not using anything.
Show me curve that doesn’t use fisheye, or CGI.
Don’t make assumptions about what I believe
Show me proof, or back off.
My point isn’t to argue for globe earth
If that’s not your point, you shouldn’t be arguing at all.
No! Fight golbe earthers
My current point is that you frequently strawman and it’s annoying
!mute @travfish scott
I’m not strawmanning when it’s provable that’s what they use to convince people the earth curves.
People
So stop talking.
Are those people in this channel rn
Is that who you’re responding too?
Bring a counter argument, or shush it.
A relatable argument that addresses how you achieve imagery of curve.
Why can’t I talk about what I choose?
