''De León ascribed the work to Shimon bar Yochai ("Rashbi"), a rabbi of the 2nd century during the Roman persecution[5] ''

Mhm, did you read the next sentence?

as·cribe
/əˈskrīb/
Learn to pronounce
verb
past tense: ascribed; past participle: ascribed
attribute something to (a cause).

Where they say it can’t possible have been him because it references things that happened after the Talmud?

If you’re going to be an asshole, you might want to have your facts straight

together with the circumstance that it refers to historical events of the post-Talmudical period,

When you read that, what does that mean to you?

@floridaswamptrash which makes arguing about religion pretty much pointless

De Leon never said he completed the Zohar, he compiled all the works that was passed down and published it

Yes, good work, that’s correct

Now did you read the entire article like a good boy?

Finish your homework

He gave the works credit to a 2nd century rabbi

Mhm, and what does the article say about that assertion?

Do you need me to answer that for you, or can you read all the letters yourself?

ok im positive im getting trolled lmao

@Sassy Undeniably Possibility

Well you’re being a petulant child so that’s how I’m treating you

But can you answer the question?

@Deleted User publisher != creator of the book

Did you read the whole article?

Just mute Sophia, insults

Mhm yes good job honey

well when you realize it is just a belief you then gain perspective and put it in it's proper place

Now did you finish the whole article like a big boy?

Where it says that attribution can’t possibly be accurate

Because it references things in the post Talmudic period?

Post-Talmudic means “after the Talmud”

she doesn't know anything about history, she attributed the talmud to the middle ages then said the zorah was created in the middle ages wtf

Let me know if you’re still following along

The Zohar was created in the Middle Ages

The Talmud was created in late antiquity

seems to me this discussion should happen in the religious section

I was confusing the Talmud with the combined Talmud and mishna, it was my mistake

But my point still stands

in your head

Ok, so we’ve proved that the Zohar was written after the Talmud

Mhm, what part of my point doesn’t stand honey?

Can you use your words like a big boy?

Maybe make a full syllogism like they’re teaching you in your freshman logic class?