Hmm what about satellites streaming the earth?

search up pics of the earth

get a telescope and look at other planets

Well it goes like this someone discoved fire and also that it was hot and taught others hey don't play with fire or you will get burned. No theory needed. Now when you want to know why something is hot you look at what makes it combustible and at what temp and what breaks down and so on and so forth. Still known things no theory interjected. But if you want to know things you do experiments and repeat them. Not go well I think this is how it works and if it doesn't gravity then.

that's a theoryu

theory

> if I touch fire I will get burned

That is evidence

another

what goes up must come down

that is science

isaac newton

You are explaining a process of justifying hypothesizes and saying that isn't science when that is essentially the definition of science

Fg = Gm1 x Gm2 / r^2

that's also a theory

every action has an equal and opposite reaction

So from that it’s obvious that distance a main factor

a theory, in scientific terms, is a proven statement

a hypothesis is a guess

science does not prove

The question is a theory not the actual fire. fire is hot it is no theory needed.

An educated guess

A theory is supported by observational, physical and mathematical proofs

Sassy any reasonable process of weighting various hypothesizes about natural things is a scientific process

fire is hot IS a thoery

theory

you have two hypothesizes

it's a proven statement

> fire burns me

> fire won't burn me

that's not how it works

you are prescribing confidence in the one the evidence lines up with

i tried to explain to him that science doesn't prove but only gives the best guess

the laws I said earlier weren't hypotheses

those were theories

proven facts

and science gives a better guess than your beliefs

If there is one rule that there has 100% confidence tho

>theories are proven facts

lmao

That’d be entropy