Theoryville is a literal place

How else would you weight your explanation for certain natural things other than theorizing

we don't just theorize

quit steering the topic away

Yes. Gravity pulls equally from all sides. If everything is equally pulled toward a common centre, and the object is of sufficient mass, it will become a three dimensional surface

It’s inevitable

we've said so many times now that after theorizing, we PROVE it to be true

science doesn't prove

yes

it does

no one thinks science proves things like mathematics

@SpiderLedgic (Cancer) we're asking for evidence, not a definition

otherwise it isn't science

It dose and it doesn’t

you have no idea what you are talking about

that was evidence

you really think science proves like mathematics?

science is evidence

you want evidence?

No science is a methodology for weighing certain hypothesis over others of various natural occurances

Hmm what about satellites streaming the earth?

search up pics of the earth

get a telescope and look at other planets

Well it goes like this someone discoved fire and also that it was hot and taught others hey don't play with fire or you will get burned. No theory needed. Now when you want to know why something is hot you look at what makes it combustible and at what temp and what breaks down and so on and so forth. Still known things no theory interjected. But if you want to know things you do experiments and repeat them. Not go well I think this is how it works and if it doesn't gravity then.

that's a theoryu

theory

> if I touch fire I will get burned

That is evidence

another

what goes up must come down

that is science

isaac newton

You are explaining a process of justifying hypothesizes and saying that isn't science when that is essentially the definition of science

Fg = Gm1 x Gm2 / r^2

that's also a theory

every action has an equal and opposite reaction

So from that it’s obvious that distance a main factor

a theory, in scientific terms, is a proven statement

a hypothesis is a guess

science does not prove

The question is a theory not the actual fire. fire is hot it is no theory needed.