You are explaining a process of justifying hypothesizes and saying that isn't science when that is essentially the definition of science

Fg = Gm1 x Gm2 / r^2

that's also a theory

every action has an equal and opposite reaction

So from that it’s obvious that distance a main factor

a theory, in scientific terms, is a proven statement

a hypothesis is a guess

science does not prove

The question is a theory not the actual fire. fire is hot it is no theory needed.

An educated guess

A theory is supported by observational, physical and mathematical proofs

Sassy any reasonable process of weighting various hypothesizes about natural things is a scientific process

fire is hot IS a thoery

theory

you have two hypothesizes

it's a proven statement

> fire burns me

> fire won't burn me

that's not how it works

you are prescribing confidence in the one the evidence lines up with

i tried to explain to him that science doesn't prove but only gives the best guess

the laws I said earlier weren't hypotheses

those were theories

proven facts

and science gives a better guess than your beliefs

If there is one rule that there has 100% confidence tho

>theories are proven facts

lmao

That’d be entropy

You need theory to know a fire is hot well I feel for you then cause i can touch it and know

they are

the scientific definiton

not common def

Sassy you are literally using inference to the best explanation principles to realize that, which is the basis of science!

wut

fran give me a sec

ok

I'm just explaining what science is since you clearly know nothing about it

A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world.

Did it go over your head?

snort has no idea what he is talking about