Message from @Drewski4343
Discord ID: 657247139998728213
Hello Metallica!
which top 3 points
what are they and how are they debunked, is it in this chat somewhere up
no it's been done over and over again , if they weren't debunked there'd be no flat earthers lol
15:31] ❄️Holly Jolly Drewski❄️: Personally? I think we're in a spinning galaxy. Do I have the means to prove it? No. I'm taking the word of mainstream science on it.
is far from mainstream
if its science its proven
*If someone doesn't value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn’t value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?*
cant you prove it the same way science has
or do you have blind faith?
blind faith in mainstream science
is your argument that you have no reason to disbelieve mainstream science?
@carlito Oh, yes, and I've looked through the counters for this and there is nothing I've seen that can accurately debunk this observation. Basically the only explanations are speculations. Like *maybe* the sky is liquid and moving in different directions? It's a lesser argument for sure. And combine it with other observations like the south celestial pole (and various other constellations) being observed from all southern hemi vantage points and it makes the arguement even stronger.
@chad46 Science doesn't deal in proofs. Theories and ideas can always change.
So, I'm open to possibilities. If and when GR is dethroned for a theory of everything, I'll be open to that too.
your really going with science doesnt prove things?
This can't be the first you've heard this.
i will think about this,, and get back to you.. @Drewski4343 im still waiting for your explanation of the 2tonne floating clouds though remember that ?!
ok so nothing can be proven? is this some kind of flexible reality?
i've heard of it but also haven't been satisfied with answers , but it's possible we'll never have all the answers right?
@carlito haha vaguely! I still don't know enough about that to debate it, I'll have to do some reading.
and probably won't
@chad46 Scientific theories are kind of the "final" stage. It's a working system that describes something, but if it's *disproven* or a better system comes along, it will adapt to the new theory.
our capacity to find real answers is also severely limited thanks to the fact that we are a small newish community with limited resources in comparison to what the NASA's & UN's of the world have access to and deliberately restrict us from
yup, totally understandable. but you guys have a quite a few dedicated researchers out there doing experiments, which is exceptional.
so has it been proven scientifically that we live on a spinning ball?@Drewski4343
your answer must be no
I'd say no, it hasn't been scientifically proven. But the evidence, in my opinion, supports it. Can new evidence emerge that shows it's a not a globe? Certainly.
when you say you can view the constellations in the south, do all see the same constellations at the same angles in the sky? iow, do they all see exactly the same image when looking up, or are the constellations in present but in different parts of the sky depending on where you are in the South
the sun is claimed to be a ball of gas/plasma, this isnt proven either
Depending on where you're looking from, the constellations themselves will be roughly the same location in the sky, but at a different rotation around the south celestial pole compared to a different southern continent.
...I don't know if I explained that well, I'll try to find a pic.
these things are taught as fact, but you are saying this is not so
we are taught the universe is expanding, another false teaching
so one moves anticlockwise, the other clockwise oh okay
is that what you mean about 'rotating different'
yes, exactly.
and this happens throughout the year okay , yeah, i get you
there is a theory that the sky contains mirrors or is a mirror-like substance with mirror like properties
Hello hello.
I would like to talk about flat earth.
they tried to prove it by taking a picture of the reflection of stars off a lake , not sure if i understood it correctly though