is california one of them?

jk

nah gold would melt there too easy

good morning chat

@carlito I would love to. You can know as much as me you just have to research the processes and it is a lot but if you are passionate about it you can spend about 2 days cramming the information in threw definition and videos and then right down their breakdowns in word so you can easily pull them up.

flat earth the only correct model

okays sounds great, @Sassy Undeniably .. i've taught before using drawings i created based on various syllabus and you'd be amazed how much information can actually squeeze into one sized A3 drawing lol .. i will keep u updated and thanks!

If someone throws a definition at you look it up on the spot. I find this is the best way to learn new stuff that sticks so when you hear it again you can process it and it's association and application in discussions. Globe heads like to throw out things and see what sticks. I like to smack the hell out of them with information and see how long the smack print last. It usually doesn't wear off that fast. LOL

<:yikes:625719605431631875>

!mute @Karrp

yeah the bot smacks karrp three times for trying

@Sassy Undeniably don’t you think it weird how most flat earth don’t have a basic understanding of science

Salutations, all!

another subjective statement @shakz7 when will you learn?

hahaha, and i agree with what you said about the 2 day cram session, but still there is more information / puzzle pieces that need filling that aren't available online

@ProgrammerVerbatim you are saying gravity doesn’t exist

no im asking for proof

which doesn't rely on making up a theory

you claim it doesn't exist

Why are you not floating rn

which goes against the standing theory

i will retract my claim if i get solid proof

so the burden of proof rests on you

@shakz7 because my density < earth and > the air

@Thuis001 the standing theory should be proven first

No

it has been

then say it

it's how it got to be the standing theory in the first place

@ProgrammerVerbatim so what you have a greater density

@shakz7 I beg to differ however I do find it weird that most globe heads want to argue about what we know when they can't prove anything at all and resort to focusing on the individuals and not the information provided. I think it is a big symptom of trying to fight of cognitive dissonance of to which I give globalist all the time.

@shakz7 than the air yes

@ProgrammerVerbatim what’s keeping you on the earth

@shakz7 density and the natural inclination of objects

to become stationary

we are not floating because there is a bias towards ground , and because of the verifiable existence of buoyancy and density

What's this debate about?

gravity