we aren't talking about cameras, we're talking about what they saw with their own eyes
@Superiorna_Artiljerija You know the AEGIS Fire Control Network for the Burke, right?
Also there was an x-ray telescope on apollo that was able to see stars
No flat earther thinks there an edge @nesymerp1
What about it
they should've seen space full of stars but they claimed otherwise
Well, let's talk
About how prior to it
@Question For Your Life Are you sure about that
Radar was limited to about 25km for surface targets
Due to the horizon
Even though it could track and intercept an aircraft out to 250km
Think SM-2
Or RIM-66
I can't speak for everyone but most people here and another servers agree unless they're flat Earth Society @That Sick 🅱astard
lolol
Wrong
you see
@Question For Your Life Most people here have some type of religious belief about the flat earth
Guys, how high up so I need to be to see across the US? Or is there a photo of it?
Why do you think there an edge who here claimed it first @That Sick 🅱astard @nesymerp1
And some will even go as far to argue this bs gas pressure argument as well
Of course, AEGIS can track targets over the horizon, but monopulse systems were not capable of such
And then say "you need a container" which infers a dome
And the dome stops somewhere
Thus an edge
why don't you research flat earthers before saying that it's bs?
Shipborne BVR
Thank you for coming to my ted talk
Also you can see the smoke trail of a Moskva Class from easily 100km away, but only the ship around 25km away
Thanks for the old info 😂 @That Sick 🅱astard
An odd thing indeed
We are not flat Earth Society and we do not hold their claims as our own @nesymerp1
@Superiorna_Artiljerija SM-2 would love a flat Earth
As would RGM-84s
@Question For Your Life I had to refresh your memory because you seem to forget that part so why are you saying most people don't believe in that?
Or any non-AESA type FCS
anything with a guidance system like that would love it
Antarctica is the highest in average surface height
