Blue Origin, SpaceX, SLA, ULA, MIS, etc.

4000 years of going through endless space at 1.5 million km an hour and constellations are still the same ever since

SpaceX is 100% private, subsidized doesn't mean it isn't Private

yeah it's because they're so faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar away

Constellations have moved, what do you mean?

They actually are not

They are changing, even as we see them

@carlito I hope you find something productive

Changes are small, but noticeable

Even Greek constellations were noticeably different

i hope so too .. it's about time i do

This is something we actually went into when discussing Early Engineering / Astronomy practices

Also, speed is entirely relative

Relative to other constellations, we are not moving at such speeds

Nor relative to the stars we generally see

In fact, what we can see is limited by the cluttering of stars in the sky, the further you look into it.

And that is with what we have detected and cataloged thus far

If you look at the catalogs, they are literally done in stripes so we can catalog all the stars in a small stripe area

We've barely even scratched the surface

Wait, why is that image of the horizon valid, but if you go just a bit higher to capture a wider angle its fake?

Oh hey

A Coast Guard icebreaker

https://i.stack.imgur.com/yPomB.png

Horizon looks curved there. Where is the cutting off point between valid picture and fake?

go away trolls this is not for debate

@TheNidhugg take off your globie goggles <:globiegoggles:471871376559702038>

Asking an honest question

From my perspective it's just the horizon level but higher up and a wider angle being taken into consideration

So we aren't allowed to debate here?

Or am I missing something?

no, you're right, this isn't the debate channel

Nasa - Masters at pathological lying

Those clusters are actually different

In small ways, but noticeable all the same

did colin take a camera crew person along with him, or was it all solo and him doing his own camerawork too @That Sick 🅱astard

this is a good one

@carlito From what I've read about it, it keeps saying solo so I'm guessing it was him alone

I just dont understand why you guys are using image proofs as a basis for refuting nasa claims when we established all NASA images are bunk anyway. Those flat horizon pics are just as fake as the curve ones.