<:BigGrin:507986757753634826>

@California Nightmare 3.0 He is making an assumption that FE in general is based on religion.

To make a claim for all would be counter-productive

You assume, after all, that all "Globe-Earthers" have no evidence

hello flat earthers

i am also one

It is a religion
Globe doesn’t rely on the scientific method
Only faith

That, indeed, is an assumption.

And ironically proves the prior point.

I can’t find any proof of the globe
Not a single one

I can, and have.

Regardless, the problem is...

No answers
Only more question

Any proof you will deny as such.

NASA is not a reliable source

Because it contradicts your own belief set.

Beyond the fact that, in general, NASA is, I am not using them as a source.

Nope
I’ll accept it if it’s verifiable

why is mommy and daddy fighting

You in fact

Assume that.

And if it follows the scientific method

So in the meantime I’ll be waiting for evidence

You in fact deny the evidence in front of you.

What evidence

If you are able to deny, without evidence, the people who have repeated such experiments or experiences...

im 69

Then you are denying the scientific method

Ayyyyy @MysticMusic

@Thinky ayyyyyy

haha funny sex number

Very funny, haha

Is funny, because number looks like funny thing.

hhh ikr

in a court of law, NASA would be deemed a discredited witnesses. would only take one solid piece of evidence.

and we have hundreds

@Flat Earth PhD wanna join vc?

I can only join for about 15mins then have a meeting

Oh okay

In a court of law, NASA would be one of theost reliable witnesses you could hope to have.

Bypasses most problems with admissing heresay as evidence