Idk that it happened ig

Depends on the role

@Derek Nelson all you do is send graphics and videos, do you have math to back up any of these, or do you just think that images and drawings disprove a globe

Observation is the first step of the scientific method. Not my fault you post no observations that aren’t proven to be artificial.

put observation is fallible, any scientist who studies large scale objects like planets, stars or the universe knows this

stars twinkle, but only to us, because of the atmosphere, flawing that observation

youre just proving my point lmao

You’re proving mine when you don’t operate by proof.

i do

math

Scientific method or go home.

just because it isnt visible doesnt mean it isnt valid

some one has never actually spent time in a real scientific community

@Flat Earth PhD I'm a little late, but here's a good example of exposure. In this video, the exposure has been set for lower lighting conditions and allows us to see the stars in the background. If you take a look at the first 3 seconds of the video, though, that exposure completely blows out the details on the arm of the satellite on the right of the screen to the point of just being pure white. Those are the kind of lighting extremes you get with different exposure rates (depending on your camera).
https://youtu.be/6jq8-UjhHh4

love that vid @Drewski4343 , so pretty

Mainstream science operates by scientific consensus. Where they merely all agree with eachother theories are real. Excusing themselves from proving it. Religions do the same thing.

@inky Love that nice bit of aurora borealis

nope, thats not how they operate, thats just how you want them to operate so that you can say they are wrong

things are constantly disproved and proved in science, especially in post doc research

so what causes "gravity" to you?

LOL

Since it’s your burden of proof, you have to tell me.

Derek has the best gifs, ngl

I try.

Much love despite our disagreements, Drewski.

mass bending space time and affecting the things around it, one of the four fundamental forces

haha absolutely

and we can see it in every star, galaxy and planet

operates exactly how the mathematical proof shows

You’re missing something calling tangible. If you can’t directly observe and measure, you’re still assuming. I’m really sorry, but it’s true.

i can directly observe and measure, drop a pencil, watch a planet circle a distant star, calculate masses, enter into the gravitational formula and see if the times match up for both]

You can directly observe Venus without actually being able to get there?

Just stop, please.

yea by seeing it and following its movement in the night sky

with a light margin of error because of atmospheric lensing and turbulence

Stop forcing your beliefs on me.