Message from @curious guy
Discord ID: 687001532952084487
@curious guy why can't i
??
Because you don't know how life began
You don't know either
Yup, I don't
So
But I'm not the one saying it's highly likely that some life was created in exoplanets
You can't also judge that there shouldn't be life
I didn't make any claim
Move this conversation to another channel
This channel is only for flat earth related discussions
I'm saying you can't make the claim
@California Nightmare 3.0 <#538929818834698260> ??
I saw some compressed images of the horizon being represented as proof for globe Earth
Or are there other channels
Sad thing is, neither the flat Earthers nor the globe Earthers knew how much the horizon *should* curve in the picture
Sure
Or lounge
This is why the formula is important
Both sides were arguing blatantly without evidence, just opinions
Authority evidence?
No
The formula can be derived by anyone
No authority involved
I wasn't talking about that
> Both sides were arguing blatantly without evidence, just opinions
@curious guy
If I say something that a physician said. Than I have the authority advantage/argument
Well that depends on the credibility of the physician, and whether the statement is backed up by evidence
Then the earth is a globe. A lot of physicians (probably all) agree
Also, what I meant by evidence in my first statement was that both sides of the arguement were making claims about whether or not the horizon should curve without using a formula
Ok, lets derive the formula
Btw a physician is a doctor, you probably mean physicist. And them agreeing alone is not sufficient, what have they done to gain credibility? And what is the evidence to their claim?
Lol yes I mean them
> Btw a physician is a doctor, you probably mean physicist. And them agreeing alone is not sufficient, what have they done to gain credibility? And what is the evidence to their claim?
@curious guy you know what he meant
English isn't my mother language
> Well that depends on the credibility of the physician, and whether the statement is backed up by evidence
@curious guy lol
What? @rAven
I mean that it’s clear by context what @CatataFish meant
@pablochanches I already have derived it, and at 10 meters height above sea level and 80° horizontal AOV, the angular drop in the appearance of the horizon due to it's curvature should be 0.0237°, or 1/20th the angular size of the moon, basically 1-5 pixels if generous, so no, the curvature of the horizon should not be visible in compressed images of the horizon at low altitude
He is correcting him in a small mistake, that he made too @rAven
@curious guy Nice
> He is correcting him in a small mistake, that he made too @rAven
@pablochanches oh did I make that mistake? Could you point me to it?