Then you can't judge whether life should be out there in the universe

@curious guy why can't i

??

Because you don't know how life began

You don't know either

Yup, I don't

So

But I'm not the one saying it's highly likely that some life was created in exoplanets

You can't also judge that there shouldn't be life

I didn't make any claim

Move this conversation to another channel
This channel is only for flat earth related discussions

I'm saying you can't make the claim

@California Nightmare 3.0 <#538929818834698260> ??

I saw some compressed images of the horizon being represented as proof for globe Earth

Or are there other channels

Sad thing is, neither the flat Earthers nor the globe Earthers knew how much the horizon *should* curve in the picture

Sure
Or lounge

This is why the formula is important

Both sides were arguing blatantly without evidence, just opinions

Authority evidence?

No

The picture was taken by a person in the argument

The formula can be derived by anyone

No authority involved

I wasn't talking about that

> Both sides were arguing blatantly without evidence, just opinions
@curious guy

If I say something that a physician said. Than I have the authority advantage/argument

Well that depends on the credibility of the physician, and whether the statement is backed up by evidence

Then the earth is a globe. A lot of physicians (probably all) agree

Also, what I meant by evidence in my first statement was that both sides of the arguement were making claims about whether or not the horizon should curve without using a formula

Ok, lets derive the formula

Btw a physician is a doctor, you probably mean physicist. And them agreeing alone is not sufficient, what have they done to gain credibility? And what is the evidence to their claim?

Lol yes I mean them

> Btw a physician is a doctor, you probably mean physicist. And them agreeing alone is not sufficient, what have they done to gain credibility? And what is the evidence to their claim?
@curious guy you know what he meant

English isn't my mother language

> Well that depends on the credibility of the physician, and whether the statement is backed up by evidence
@curious guy lol

What? @rAven

I mean that it’s clear by context what @CatataFish meant

@pablochanches I already have derived it, and at 10 meters height above sea level and 80° horizontal AOV, the angular drop in the appearance of the horizon due to it's curvature should be 0.0237°, or 1/20th the angular size of the moon, basically 1-5 pixels if generous, so no, the curvature of the horizon should not be visible in compressed images of the horizon at low altitude

He is correcting him in a small mistake, that he made too @rAven

@curious guy Nice