you have work to do 😄

lol

see ya later log

Authority will always claim a monopoly of credibility.
But as it grows in corruption,
controversial truths will be labeled invalid.

Authorities establish institutions to verify themselves through dominance. People are then forced to obtain credibility by agreeing with what a handful of people assert is true. You are not a scientist for getting a minimum C average and a bachelor's degree. that just means you are good at retaining information. but is it true to begin with?

the globe was a crafted deception that branches out into several others including evolution, the existence of ETs, "global" warming etc

What are ET's?

"extraterrestrials"

There hasn't been sufficient evidence to suggest their existence, not even allegedly

but people will still ponder it going "i mean...they gotta be out there mannn. look at how BIG the universe is"

because they got duped into heliocentrism

That's a fallacy

The size of the universe is irrelevant until there is an experiment to prove how life developed

ask almost anyone and they will give you the response i just described

the point is, the masses are more than willing to believe in them

You guys know that every glober thinks you are brainwashed

@Millennium Envoy it's really huge the universe. With billions of stars and planets. It's highly likely that some planets were friendly for life and that some life was created there

Do you know how life can begin?

@curious guy I'm no biologist but millions years of evolution

That's how it develeops, how does the first micro-organism form?

Don't ask me I'm not a biologist

I have only heard it did

Then you can't judge whether life should be out there in the universe

@curious guy why can't i

??

Because you don't know how life began

You don't know either

Yup, I don't

So

But I'm not the one saying it's highly likely that some life was created in exoplanets

You can't also judge that there shouldn't be life

I didn't make any claim

Move this conversation to another channel
This channel is only for flat earth related discussions

I'm saying you can't make the claim

@California Nightmare 3.0 <#538929818834698260> ??

I saw some compressed images of the horizon being represented as proof for globe Earth

Or are there other channels

Sad thing is, neither the flat Earthers nor the globe Earthers knew how much the horizon *should* curve in the picture

Sure
Or lounge

This is why the formula is important

Both sides were arguing blatantly without evidence, just opinions