Message from @Logrian

Discord ID: 687004419874750653


2020-03-10 18:22:38 UTC  

Also, what I meant by evidence in my first statement was that both sides of the arguement were making claims about whether or not the horizon should curve without using a formula

2020-03-10 18:23:24 UTC  

Ok, lets derive the formula

2020-03-10 18:23:53 UTC  

Btw a physician is a doctor, you probably mean physicist. And them agreeing alone is not sufficient, what have they done to gain credibility? And what is the evidence to their claim?

2020-03-10 18:24:06 UTC  

Lol yes I mean them

2020-03-10 18:24:36 UTC  

> Btw a physician is a doctor, you probably mean physicist. And them agreeing alone is not sufficient, what have they done to gain credibility? And what is the evidence to their claim?
@curious guy you know what he meant

2020-03-10 18:24:52 UTC  

English isn't my mother language

2020-03-10 18:25:06 UTC  

> Well that depends on the credibility of the physician, and whether the statement is backed up by evidence
@curious guy lol

2020-03-10 18:25:22 UTC  

What? @rAven

2020-03-10 18:25:43 UTC  

I mean that it’s clear by context what @CatataFish meant

2020-03-10 18:26:17 UTC  

@pablochanches I already have derived it, and at 10 meters height above sea level and 80° horizontal AOV, the angular drop in the appearance of the horizon due to it's curvature should be 0.0237°, or 1/20th the angular size of the moon, basically 1-5 pixels if generous, so no, the curvature of the horizon should not be visible in compressed images of the horizon at low altitude

2020-03-10 18:27:22 UTC  

He is correcting him in a small mistake, that he made too @rAven

2020-03-10 18:27:55 UTC  
2020-03-10 18:28:44 UTC  

> He is correcting him in a small mistake, that he made too @rAven
@pablochanches oh did I make that mistake? Could you point me to it?

2020-03-10 18:29:16 UTC  

> Well that depends on the credibility of the physician, and whether the statement is backed up by evidence
@curious guy

2020-03-10 18:29:35 UTC  

Wait

2020-03-10 18:29:43 UTC  

That one wasn't clear in context

2020-03-10 18:29:45 UTC  

> Well that depends on the credibility of the physician, and whether the statement is backed up by evidence
@curious guy here

2020-03-10 18:29:51 UTC  

In a medical topic that statement is still valid, I assumed you were talking about evolution

2020-03-10 18:30:10 UTC  

Why would I mention physicists if he's talking about physicians?

2020-03-10 18:30:16 UTC  

MOVE THIS TO CIVIL DEBATE CHANNEL

2020-03-10 18:30:17 UTC  

thanks

2020-03-10 18:30:23 UTC  

final warning

2020-03-10 18:30:32 UTC  

Ok

2020-03-10 18:30:37 UTC  

What's the civil debate channel for? Miscellaneous topics?

2020-03-10 18:30:38 UTC  

It's about the earth??

2020-03-10 18:30:38 UTC  

Sorry

2020-03-10 18:30:44 UTC  

nw

2020-03-10 18:30:53 UTC  

Cata. found the curve yet?

2020-03-10 18:31:03 UTC  

???

2020-03-10 18:31:16 UTC  

Long time ago

2020-03-10 18:31:48 UTC  

Lots of people look for the curve without knowing how much it should show, atleast in terms of horizon curvature

2020-03-10 18:32:13 UTC  

The earth is huge

2020-03-10 18:32:36 UTC  

Oh this isn't a debate server, didn't know

2020-03-10 18:32:44 UTC  

at what point could you see it then?

2020-03-10 18:33:09 UTC  

It depends, how good are your eyes?

2020-03-10 18:33:27 UTC  

I don't know how good eyes are at seeing the horizon curve, but I can find the horizon curve

2020-03-10 18:49:30 UTC  

Hello fellow flat earth era

2020-03-10 18:52:57 UTC  

hello flat earther @Oak Δ

2020-03-10 18:57:04 UTC  

Anyone seen the curvature yet?

2020-03-10 18:57:38 UTC  

hiya guys 😁

2020-03-10 18:59:00 UTC  

btw, i can see the horizon curve