Message from @Logrian

Discord ID: 687717072079421559


2020-03-12 17:21:40 UTC  

if you dont know your own glob model when I demolish it how will you know 😮 😉

2020-03-12 17:22:02 UTC  

so, lets try again

2020-03-12 17:22:17 UTC  

he's a troll

2020-03-12 17:22:19 UTC  

#timewaste

2020-03-12 17:22:20 UTC  

Do ships go over the geometric horizon as to why they disappear, y or n ?

2020-03-12 17:22:20 UTC  

> Youre real dumb kid, youll fail upwards like all the rest 😉
@Logrian if i'm so dumb, would you care for giving me actual evidence for your point?

2020-03-12 17:22:28 UTC  

see? ^^

2020-03-12 17:22:31 UTC  

I rest my case

2020-03-12 17:22:34 UTC  

Do ships go over the geometric horizon as to why they disappear, y or n ?

2020-03-12 17:23:13 UTC  

ships disappear out of view because of the curve.

2020-03-12 17:24:22 UTC  

so you assert a physical ball horizon k

2020-03-12 17:25:00 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484516084846952451/687712763979759626/340416-5891-hzvrz-a1.jpg

2020-03-12 17:25:24 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484516084846952451/687712867235266597/Geometric_horizon.png

2020-03-12 17:25:31 UTC  

if the earth was flat, you'd see everything your line of sight since there's nothing that hides it. but you can't since it disappears in the distance due to the curve. at first sight it doesn't look like there is a curve, but in the way objects come and go from the distance, you see there that the top point of that object is the first and last thing you see.

2020-03-12 17:25:36 UTC  

you agree its a PHYSICAL horizon yes?

2020-03-12 17:26:42 UTC  

lmao you're just gonna put in some twisted "logic" that wouldn't even make sense to proof your "point". that image proves my point btw

2020-03-12 17:27:03 UTC  

i'm not gonna waste any more time on this. you're not gonna give me some proper evidence because clearly you don't have any

2020-03-12 17:31:54 UTC  

so by yiour logic you can tell me where that physical horizon is with the observer height, yes?

2020-03-12 17:36:11 UTC  

no

2020-03-12 17:42:07 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484516084846952451/687717071915712557/Ice_Lake.png

2020-03-12 19:08:01 UTC  

Because of refraction the horizon is not just geometric

2020-03-12 19:24:43 UTC  

for refraction you need a differential in refractive index. that only happens in certain situations when you have temperature inversions

2020-03-12 19:25:17 UTC  

if you are looking across a flat desert plane or open water, forget about refraction

2020-03-12 19:25:24 UTC  

#redherring

2020-03-12 19:26:01 UTC  

seems refraction is the new "gravity"

2020-03-12 19:26:19 UTC  

another heliocentric duct tape to cover up gaps in science

2020-03-12 19:34:48 UTC  

Liks, what typoe?

2020-03-12 19:43:24 UTC  

Why couldn't there be a temperature gradient over a desert?

2020-03-12 19:43:32 UTC  

What type?

2020-03-12 19:48:00 UTC  

according to your explanation there would have to be a temperature gradient over all surfaces all the time

2020-03-12 19:48:39 UTC  

but keep trolling.....

2020-03-12 19:49:37 UTC  

the more desperate you guys get, the more obvious it becomes that we are right

2020-03-12 19:51:41 UTC  

🤦🤦🤦

2020-03-12 19:51:58 UTC  

@zReNAgAdE504 wrong channel

2020-03-12 19:54:15 UTC  

Likes, you cannot have refraction, now what?

2020-03-12 19:57:24 UTC  

maybe.....gravity?

2020-03-12 19:57:32 UTC  

<a:BlobThinkos:683883001989300254>

2020-03-12 20:34:44 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484516084846952451/687760514477981696/Aether_4.jpg

2020-03-12 20:34:54 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484516084846952451/687760556085477396/73482564_524217921505415_1824726888749203456_n.jpg

2020-03-12 20:36:08 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484516084846952451/687760864870137874/Flat_Earth_Model_1.jpg