i'm not gonna waste any more time on this. you're not gonna give me some proper evidence because clearly you don't have any

so by yiour logic you can tell me where that physical horizon is with the observer height, yes?

no

Because of refraction the horizon is not just geometric

for refraction you need a differential in refractive index. that only happens in certain situations when you have temperature inversions

if you are looking across a flat desert plane or open water, forget about refraction

#redherring

seems refraction is the new "gravity"

another heliocentric duct tape to cover up gaps in science

Liks, what typoe?

Why couldn't there be a temperature gradient over a desert?

What type?

according to your explanation there would have to be a temperature gradient over all surfaces all the time

but keep trolling.....

the more desperate you guys get, the more obvious it becomes that we are right

🤦🤦🤦

@zReNAgAdE504 wrong channel

Likes, you cannot have refraction, now what?

maybe.....gravity?

<a:BlobThinkos:683883001989300254>

@たつみ

You realize these are really, I mean REALLY old maps.

you realize these are really, I mean REALLY accurate maps.

They Know Something

I thought about that card earlier today

someone made this back in 1995

ya they have 9/11 as well as the fukushima combined disasters cards. those ones are advanced.

Tbh people who think the earth is round are just morons tbh

hey what's "lead"

Lead atmosphere

I'm pretty sure if you vaporized lead it wouldn't stay in the atmosphere long.

and it would just kinda float down to the floor.