But then you’re asking for 100% efficiency

And that’s not gonna happen

i imagine you only need something like 99.99% to get a good enough measurement that you can equal it to 100% with enough rechecks.

bunch ov fucks boiisz

@Dead that doesn’t make much sense mathematically

We already have some graphene shit

what i mean is "good enough"

Loosely rounding off numbers just to get a good looking number is not good math

yeah but they dont use graphene batteries yet in mainstream shit though

so quantum computers don't use binary, but a supposition that the outcome may equal a binary state, so neither a 1 or a 0 but a computation that may equal a 1 or 0

I think that’s how creative accounting works

well, when you do work in the real world you have to make do with "good enough"

No

Maybe if you work in fast food

google measurement accuracy.

I'm just hoping for AI breakthroughs ~~so my waifu can be real~~ we can automate the majority and be forced to adjust society so that better tech actually equals better work/life balance

I think you’re just talking out of your gaping ass

were da whores @ hmu 4 thick 6 nudes xoxox

stating uncertainty is not the same as lazy math

not really, it's my field.

i love you guys

Pretty sure if people didn’t have something to occupy their time with most of the day, a lot of them would be in prison

@ky muslim lover

yuck

wrinkle brain convo in general

whats this

If people aren’t being productive they’re just a drain imo

ive been here before.

nigger

kike

jew

i need a massive shite

have a prolapse

well

i am off to bed

Dae traps something something

night night

here here

*YUCK*

merry christmas

atomikov is santa