Message from @AstroTorch

Discord ID: 526903154021761024


2018-12-24 23:22:10 UTC  

Idk but it involves your mom and my dick so. ๐Ÿคท

2018-12-24 23:22:18 UTC  

It needs to run on fast neutrons to keep producing more fuel than it burns

2018-12-24 23:22:37 UTC  

As opposed to slow thermal neutrons that light water reactors use

2018-12-24 23:22:49 UTC  

so the only reason they haven't taken use of the tech is that they are stuck in their old ways ?

2018-12-24 23:22:50 UTC  

aye but in that scenario she could be like a doctor helping you with 3rd degree burns or watever

2018-12-24 23:22:54 UTC  

@Data Pagan what about fusion

2018-12-24 23:22:58 UTC  

Oi

2018-12-24 23:22:59 UTC  

sometimes a high energy photon (energy) can turn into an electron(matter) & positron (antimatter), then annihilate & turn back into energy if this happens at the event horizon of a black hole of one of the pair can be pulled in & then you got matter basically coming out of nothing which is gay. thats *basically* what hawking radiation is for whoever asked

2018-12-24 23:23:15 UTC  

I gave ruger's mum 3rd degree friction burns

2018-12-24 23:23:18 UTC  

Fusion is good in concept but still too expensive and the technology is super immature

2018-12-24 23:23:23 UTC  

I've had a drink though

2018-12-24 23:23:46 UTC  

We canโ€™t get a net energy gain from it yet

2018-12-24 23:23:47 UTC  

I know pretty much nothing about it and only the basics of nuclear

2018-12-24 23:24:03 UTC  

I do think that hydroelectrics is pretty good

2018-12-24 23:24:14 UTC  

@๓ €€๓ €€AK m8 yer dick can't even reach 3 degrees on a protractor

2018-12-24 23:24:28 UTC  

Dams are pretty environmentally destructive

2018-12-24 23:24:34 UTC  

the problem with hydroelectrics are the stupid "enviromentalists"

2018-12-24 23:24:55 UTC  

I don't much like dams so much as I like the idea of a sort of upside down windfarm

2018-12-24 23:24:56 UTC  

Naw, cause its in ur mum and not on a protractor

2018-12-24 23:24:59 UTC  

If that makes sense

2018-12-24 23:25:01 UTC  

hydroelectric has killed more people per MW than nuclear

2018-12-24 23:25:11 UTC  

in fact everything has

2018-12-24 23:25:12 UTC  
2018-12-24 23:25:26 UTC  

Teton dam break was more catastrophic than any nuclear meltdown in history

2018-12-24 23:25:42 UTC  

Wiped out entire towns

2018-12-24 23:25:49 UTC  

Like your mum's legs after

Actually this one was pretty weak

2018-12-24 23:26:11 UTC  

I've been there

2018-12-24 23:26:15 UTC  

Even then you also have to deal with dipshit swimmers who like to swim near the discharge vents and drown themselves

2018-12-24 23:26:16 UTC  

And I've been in it's wake

2018-12-24 23:26:21 UTC  

@Data Pagan yer mums dental dam break was more catastrophic than any nuclear meltdown in history

2018-12-24 23:26:35 UTC  

That area of the US is v beautiful

2018-12-24 23:26:45 UTC  

I don't understand half of what's being said here <:dribble:467327022641971211>

2018-12-24 23:26:59 UTC  

Well that's not surprising Mr anime pfp

2018-12-24 23:27:10 UTC  

Fukushima killed a few plant workers in the initial blast

2018-12-24 23:27:13 UTC  

Thoughts on potential fusion. Total layman here, just heard it takes more energy in than it pops out

2018-12-24 23:27:15 UTC  

Thatโ€™s pretty much it

2018-12-24 23:27:32 UTC  

I like to swim near yer mum's discharge vents and drown myself

2018-12-24 23:27:35 UTC  

I think that's part on due to how quick they got people out

2018-12-24 23:27:40 UTC  

Hoy, merry christmas you wankaz

2018-12-24 23:27:46 UTC  

Well yeah

2018-12-24 23:27:47 UTC  

@Ruger I didn't know you were into pee porn