it's possible to brainwash people

look at the US

a lot of Americans got brainwashed into hating themselves

same in Europe

and who's teaching them this bullcrap?

@DrRisen the allies? depends which war were talking about. In ww2 you had 1 democracy 1 ''democracy'' and 1 (((democracy)))

against 1 newly recovered auth state, 1 barely recovered auth state and 1 based auth state

The US entering WWI was because of Wilsoniamism
WWII was because of string pulling in the US government.
funny thing is the US almost joined the Axis at some point.

The citizenry is intergrated with the military seamlessly, as all fit males 16 and older were trained during high school, eligible females may apply for combat roles but most will be moved in support roles, such as hospital staff, admin work and maybe even combat medics. Limited conscription during peacetime, so virtually all citizens have served and are trained if needed to be called upon. Very similar to the south Korean, Estonian and other countries systems. Older population are trained in marksmanship and can direct guerilla ops or work in the factories.

<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***ofvo#8313 has been warned., Rule 7.***

@Ronin Yeeees, they pulled on so many strings that they stringpulled Japan into a sudden and deliberate attack.

The US knew about that attack it, was covered up so the US would fight on the side of the axis.

err against the axis

@Ronin Yeah, they just *let* some of the most valuable ships in the fleet be sunk to go to war. Seems legit.

the attacks didn't really do that much from what I read
Ships got sunk but it wasn't as devastating as Japan hoped.

@Ronin It could have been worse, but it was still pretty bad. Our battleship numbers in the pacific were crippled.

wasn't it like a few battleships?
My history class was pretty light on the pacific beyond what happened to our colonies.

Yeah its exaggerated alot

Pacific was cringe

like 2 major battles

The rest was curbstomping.
The most competent armies there were colonial security forces.

**QOTD 🔖 **
*How Will the new rule that bars immigrants and naturalization of immigrants who use welfare, effective today, effect the makeup, quantity and quality of immigration to the US?*

<@&587810072898306050>

still no things on assimilation

theres not enough help on that subject

we should encourage assimilation but american culture is built upon immigrant culture

so i am not very pressed on the assimilation issue

but the issue of barring people from citizenship based on welfare usage is stupid

are you going to deport american citizens born in the US and in poverty and living on welfare?

why should we treat immigrant "welfare leeches" any more different than american citizen "welfare leeches"

and on the topic of welfare, immigrants have shown to pay taxes

a good few billion

so why should we restrict the items that they pay for?

@Auriel Thats not the issue

Immigration is going to drop 70%

From a high in 2016 of 1.2M

To 300,000

And Europeans, with a quota system, would make up a good chunk of it

main reason people come is due to gibs
I think there will be less migration from bad countries tough integration is still going to be bad due to the ethnic enclaves that are already here.

I'm not sure if it'll impact migration overall due to smart people going to the US or companies wanting cheap labor from places like Mexico.
If you really want to impact it then you need to enforce those policies retroactively.

@Niveusater American culture is Anglo-Germanic.
The US was tamed by the anglos and build by the Germanics.
If anyone wants to live in the US they need to adapt to that culture.
The difference is that Americans had their ancestors build and possibly defend the nation.
Some guy from Somalia that stepped of the plane two weeks ago has no real ties to the country beyond a piece of paper.