Message from @moira

Discord ID: 686726252475711503


2020-03-09 23:26:44 UTC  

conetxtually they were speaking of the monarch

2020-03-09 23:31:30 UTC  

So if a monarch is tyrannical or corrupt, then should Christians not rebel against said monarch?

2020-03-09 23:33:15 UTC  

@Sentient23 it is not the government's job to enforce the bibles morals

2020-03-09 23:33:24 UTC  

except in the case of public decency because that is a bit different

2020-03-09 23:55:09 UTC  

Of course not. Again if you actually read the context, that concern is answered

2020-03-09 23:55:33 UTC  

Why cherry pick where you apply Christian morality and where you not apply Christian morality? Which criteria is being used for when its okay to apply and when it isn't? And why?

2020-03-09 23:56:30 UTC  

I'm not Christian

2020-03-09 23:56:47 UTC  

and I think religion should mostly stay out of legislation

2020-03-09 23:57:00 UTC  

because if you do this then you isolate other religions

2020-03-09 23:57:00 UTC  

You said that there would be circumstances in which Christian morality would be enforced?

2020-03-09 23:57:38 UTC  

when did I say that

2020-03-09 23:59:16 UTC  

"except in the case of public decency"

2020-03-09 23:59:43 UTC  

that has nothing to do with Christian morals

2020-03-09 23:59:54 UTC  

I just think that children shouldn't see grown men naked

2020-03-10 00:00:19 UTC  

Then why say "except in such and such cases" when you previously said "the government shouldnt enforce bibles morals"

2020-03-10 00:01:07 UTC  

because that is an exception

2020-03-10 00:01:16 UTC  

and because it harms other citizens

2020-03-10 00:01:37 UTC  

Why is that an exception?

2020-03-10 00:02:19 UTC  

because it can mentally scar children

2020-03-10 00:03:50 UTC  

So?

2020-03-10 00:04:57 UTC  

I don't want children to be mentally scarred

2020-03-10 00:05:02 UTC  

That's all

2020-03-10 00:05:36 UTC  

I am have lax views on what is allowed and what isn't but atleast do it with some pants on for the love of god

2020-03-10 00:06:51 UTC  

You can't justify it without religion, which is the point

2020-03-10 00:07:13 UTC  

yes you can

2020-03-10 00:07:22 UTC  

you can say how it harmfully affects children

2020-03-10 00:07:37 UTC  

that has nothing to do with religion

2020-03-10 00:08:21 UTC  

yes but you cant explain why that in and of itself is bad fundamentally speaking

2020-03-10 00:09:07 UTC  

because mental health is important

2020-03-10 00:10:37 UTC  

why should i suppress my pleasurie urges just because some kid willl be scared? At the end of the day, its just two pieces of meat rubbing against one another, in which one piece of meat has a chemical react in a certain way, and the other also has a chemical react in a certain way?

2020-03-10 00:11:15 UTC  

because mental health is fuckin important

2020-03-10 00:11:28 UTC  

at that point you are exposing the child to something harmful

2020-03-10 00:11:34 UTC  

thus infringing upon its rights

2020-03-10 00:11:38 UTC  

Its rights?

2020-03-10 00:11:43 UTC  

Are you seriously defending people who walk naked around children? @Sentient23

2020-03-10 00:11:51 UTC  

Lol justify that its a right to not have your mental health downplayed

2020-03-10 00:11:59 UTC  

@Florida Man Im demonstrating the absurdity of atheism

2020-03-10 00:12:02 UTC  

calm down bucko

2020-03-10 00:12:43 UTC  

you are right, I misspoke, I meant that it is harming the child

2020-03-10 00:13:02 UTC  

you don't need religion to justify that that is bad

2020-03-10 00:13:09 UTC  

Again, So what. Why should "mental health is important" trump my mental health which would gets an urge to sexually abuse children every 2 weeks