Cool but that’s not the point

It is the point

People justify their morality based on their “right and wrong”

I'm demonstrating how they don't go hand it hand

That’s based on what they’ve heard and their empathy

Thats emotions

Irrelevant? Stop shifting the goal post. Do you now agree after what I said, that acting our in a moral manner doesn't necessitate knowing why your morality is good?

You don’t need to bring iq into it is what i meant

Yes I agree

But I’m saying that you can justify morality based on your emotions

If you feel pity for someone because they’re crying, then you should think what made them cry is bad

No wait hold on a second

I won't let you get out of that one bucko

So you agree that you did in fact strawman me, as I never once said that atheists cannot be moral?

Imagine not understanding that morality can work without religion

Simply because I said it doesn’t mean it’s wrong

Its a yes or no question kiddo

Very simple. Or is your ego obstructing you from admitting that you mischaracterized my position?

Are you really going to prevent the argument from moving forward because of a mistake in what I said

Oh no I'm not preventing it from moving on. I'm demanding you admit you made the mistake by strawmaning me. If your ego is obstructing you from conceding such a MINOR point, why the hell would I assume you would be genuine enough to consede some MAJOR point?

> Are you really going to prevent the argument from moving forward because of a mistake in what I said
@moira

Conceded it was a mistake.

Indirectly. Say it directly. Say I admit i strawmaned you

Not that hard really

Shouldn't take you much if you genuinely seeked truth, right?

beruh

and who exactly has the ego here?

Now I’m not the problem

I admitted it was a mistake

Yet you pushed it and ignored the actual argument

Lmao

I'm not doing this for my ego buddy. I'm doing this to establish whether or not continuing a conversation with you is worth it. Simple
If you cannot concede something minor, i have no reason to believe you will be able to concede something major, if i point out a contradiction

No, you don't wanna admit that you strawmaned me

So you have to indirectly shrugg it off

> Simply because I said it doesn’t mean it’s wrong
@moira

> Are you really going to prevent the argument from moving forward because of a mistake in what I said
@moira

i not do foor ego u jus rong hurrr durr me fel hurt so now I got to hav somone tell me I’m right durrr

yea it's not for my ego, but I won't continue this argument unless you absolutely give me validation, oh yes please validate me daddy, it gives me so much joy... oh yeah oh yeah please compliment my arguments more ohhhh yeaaaaa

Again, indirect concedation is easier for the ego than a direect concediation. You're proving my point right now buddy.
I'm not asking you to tell me I'm right. I'm asking you to admit that you strawmaned me directly. Why is it taking you 20 minutes if you genuinely debate for the truth?

Again not about validation you strawmanning fuck

I said multiple times its for X not for Y, and yet again you keep on insisting its the Y