Message from @moira
Discord ID: 686738038671671316
You never addressed my explanation as to why im fixating on that
If you cannot concede that which is minor, you cannot concede that which is major. Because a major contradiction without your worldview is of much significance than a minor strawman
Imagine spending more time arguing about a fallacy than the actual original debate topic
Again strawmaning me lmao
I said 10 times
You never addressed my explanation
> If you cannot concede that which is minor, you cannot concede that which is major. Because a major contradiction without your worldview is of much significance than a minor strawman
Address this explanation
This is why Im asking
You cannot keep on ignoring the explanation and insisting the contrary
that is not the fuckin topic anymore
if anyone is strawmaning now it is you
...
its something which is crucial to whether or not me and you should have a debate at all
now move onto the main fekkin argument
If you truly wanted to argue you’d concede that I actually admitted I made a mistake
If your ego is SO big that you cant concede a minor point, continuing talking to you is useless, since if i do refute your thesis, you wont concede since that would be major, and admitting major mistakes is MUCH harder than admitting minor mistakes
No you indirectly shrugged it off
then you ridiculed it by "ironically" admitting it
when?
again you want me to be like “Sorry sir. I strawmanned you. I apologize to you. Please don’t take this personally”
No. I simply want you admitting that you strawmaned me directly
No dick sucking, nothing
Just an admission
i already did
Because “if I can’t concede something this minor, how can you expect me to concede something major”
Do you not read what I say?
"I simply want you admitting that you strawmaned me **directly** "
You indirectly shrugged it off
because i want to move on with the debate
but does it invalidate my point
Does it invalidate any argument
you know to the thing we are actually here for
did a fallacy made in an online debate really irk you so much you pushed it for over 20 minutes
me big brian cause I use big words and call literally everything strawmanning
It's purpose isn't to invalidate your argument. The purpose of this is to establish for me whether or not you actually seek truth, or whether or not you engage a debate with a high ego, who's only intention is to dunk on someone
If its the latter, then that would explain why its taking you 30 fucking minutes to admitting a MINOR mistake. Why would i assume you will concede an argument if i point out a major contradiction, if you cant admit a minor error
LMAO
> It's purpose isn't to invalidate your argument. The purpose of this is to establish for me whether or not you actually seek truth, or whether or not you engage a debate with a high ego, who's only intention is to dunk on someone
> If its the latter, then that would explain why its taking you 30 fucking minutes to admitting a MINOR mistake. Why would i assume you will concede an argument if i point out a major contradiction, if you cant admit a minor error
@Sentient23
Yikes
Thank you SO much for proving my point right now
I'm so glad i actually thought of this the other day as a mechanism to establish whether someone's genuine or not