Message from @valencia/Vaida
Discord ID: 686737664250216474
HAHAHAHAAH
This is so fascinating right now, I actually cannot believe this lol
i already fucking did
move on
How big does your ego have to be that you cannot concede a minor point without indirectly shrugging it off and "ironically" conceding
a You don’t want to argue if you’re gonna focus on that
I admitted it
THAT IS NOT THE FUCKING TOPIC ANYMORE
I cannot believe someone is so passionate about getting internet strangers to admit they were wrong for their own personal self satisfaction
You never addressed my explanation as to why im fixating on that
If you cannot concede that which is minor, you cannot concede that which is major. Because a major contradiction without your worldview is of much significance than a minor strawman
Imagine spending more time arguing about a fallacy than the actual original debate topic
Again strawmaning me lmao
I said 10 times
You never addressed my explanation
> If you cannot concede that which is minor, you cannot concede that which is major. Because a major contradiction without your worldview is of much significance than a minor strawman
Address this explanation
This is why Im asking
You cannot keep on ignoring the explanation and insisting the contrary
that is not the fuckin topic anymore
if anyone is strawmaning now it is you
its something which is crucial to whether or not me and you should have a debate at all
now move onto the main fekkin argument
If you truly wanted to argue you’d concede that I actually admitted I made a mistake
If your ego is SO big that you cant concede a minor point, continuing talking to you is useless, since if i do refute your thesis, you wont concede since that would be major, and admitting major mistakes is MUCH harder than admitting minor mistakes
No you indirectly shrugged it off
then you ridiculed it by "ironically" admitting it
when?
again you want me to be like “Sorry sir. I strawmanned you. I apologize to you. Please don’t take this personally”
Is that what you want
No. I simply want you admitting that you strawmaned me directly
No dick sucking, nothing
Just an admission
i already did
Because “if I can’t concede something this minor, how can you expect me to concede something major”
Do you not read what I say?
"I simply want you admitting that you strawmaned me **directly** "
You indirectly shrugged it off
because i want to move on with the debate
but does it invalidate my point
Does it invalidate any argument
you know to the thing we are actually here for