But what does this have to do with Mongolite being a tool

I dunno. Maybe I'm giving him a good argument. Maybe I'm giving you a good argument. I care about the truth and telling it, which means I'm saying this to the people with ears for the truth, nothing else.

That's all well and good

I don't think it's solved much

Since the big root of the argument is "my rejection of christ"

ok nerds

^

@Doktor Goon Solving implies dissolution. The centralizing claim of Christianity is that Christ is the Logos; that is, in essence, "ratio rex", Word, the first fire, the last law, the rule of rule, or the resolution of resolution, and so on. This philosophy is what holds Christianity together technically, historically, and, by definition, logically. Thus, the rejection of Christ (through rejection of the Logos) is true for you extensively (ie if you say you disbelieve), but that is also true for most "Christians", for they primarily pay sincere lip service to the Logos. However, if you intensively reject the Logos, you adopt a "revolutionary spirit" against all truth or standing, as seen in devout communists, for example. Like you said the root is found in rejection, but the treetop is found in welcome. The Christian answers that the axis mundi of this tree is this golden branch. It is a metaphysical assertion. Nonetheless, the question of meaning for any man is: What is his rejection of Logos, the golden branch? Yet, he is answered in the questions of how far down, how simply, and how intensively he rejects Logos, not in his knowledge of climbing, branches, and abstraction (as many "Christians" have you believe).

This is a long winded answer not for a question that's "Why is this sperg being a dick to me?"

@Doktor Goon treat it as a technical meme, a high effort/ long form shitpost

You know what

I will

spergs sperg, for it is their nature

do you keep asking your car why it guzzles gas?

I know why spergs sperg

then, his dickishness is in question because he was just that special?

a special sperg with a special heart

Sure

Then, you got him beat now and forever, since you've practiced enduring retarded replies and sassed back to special spergery. Be easy with that. With great power and great responsibillty, come great humor.

With great autism comes very autistic responsibility

😤

<@&588707615643795456> Daily Question 🔖

- To what extent should the church be involved in the state

ok

No.

Nice question shitlord

None at all

i agree

the church should be the state

theocratic gang

^

im le theocracy

soo

Yes.

It shouldn’t be in the state as it mutually helps corrupt both further. But it should have a better position in the community to make sure that a certain type of government is only ever capable of coming into power (creates a certain moral standing)

State should endorse the church but not control the church, nor’ should the church control the state

As cool as theocracy is it threatens the church becoming corrupt

^

None. The state should protect the church, and the church should cooperate with the state when their areas meet, i.e. helping the poor. The church should either cooperate or denounce the state. Other than that, in relation to the state, nothing.

Which Church?

Nvm I see

*reading*