Message from @Valkindir
Discord ID: 669315980345999370
Freud was like, "what are you on bro".
😂
Freud was like "how's it about sex though"
@Doktor Goon But, Eoppa makes a good point. If you can understand the subject this way, for what it is, you then have to talk about how it came there, both historically and logically; correspondantly and consistently. This is why subjectivism from subjectivism (from subjectivism....) only gets you as far as "elephants all the way down". And, reality isn't built on strict reference alone, since patterns are perceived, not just patterned. That story of self cannot tell you the origin, either in terms of an originating act or an originating subject. And, so you come to a place of mystery (as mysterium).
But what does this have to do with Mongolite being a tool
I dunno. Maybe I'm giving him a good argument. Maybe I'm giving you a good argument. I care about the truth and telling it, which means I'm saying this to the people with ears for the truth, nothing else.
That's all well and good
I don't think it's solved much
Since the big root of the argument is "my rejection of christ"
ok nerds
^
@Doktor Goon Solving implies dissolution. The centralizing claim of Christianity is that Christ is the Logos; that is, in essence, "ratio rex", Word, the first fire, the last law, the rule of rule, or the resolution of resolution, and so on. This philosophy is what holds Christianity together technically, historically, and, by definition, logically. Thus, the rejection of Christ (through rejection of the Logos) is true for you extensively (ie if you say you disbelieve), but that is also true for most "Christians", for they primarily pay sincere lip service to the Logos. However, if you intensively reject the Logos, you adopt a "revolutionary spirit" against all truth or standing, as seen in devout communists, for example. Like you said the root is found in rejection, but the treetop is found in welcome. The Christian answers that the axis mundi of this tree is this golden branch. It is a metaphysical assertion. Nonetheless, the question of meaning for any man is: What is his rejection of Logos, the golden branch? Yet, he is answered in the questions of how far down, how simply, and how intensively he rejects Logos, not in his knowledge of climbing, branches, and abstraction (as many "Christians" have you believe).
This is a long winded answer not for a question that's "Why is this sperg being a dick to me?"
@Doktor Goon treat it as a technical meme, a high effort/ long form shitpost
You know what
I will
spergs sperg, for it is their nature
do you keep asking your car why it guzzles gas?
I know why spergs sperg
then, his dickishness is in question because he was just that special?
Sure
Then, you got him beat now and forever, since you've practiced enduring retarded replies and sassed back to special spergery. Be easy with that. With great power and great responsibillty, come great humor.
With great autism comes very autistic responsibility
😤
<@&588707615643795456> Daily Question 🔖
- To what extent should the church be involved in the state
ok
No.
Nice question shitlord
None at all
i agree
the church should be the state
theocratic gang
^
im le theocracy
soo
Yes.
It shouldn’t be in the state as it mutually helps corrupt both further. But it should have a better position in the community to make sure that a certain type of government is only ever capable of coming into power (creates a certain moral standing)
State should endorse the church but not control the church, nor’ should the church control the state
As cool as theocracy is it threatens the church becoming corrupt
^