Message from @moira

Discord ID: 689579819612373044


2020-03-17 20:59:14 UTC  

@Sentient23 I wont because I think you are an egotistical assh…

2020-03-17 20:59:24 UTC  
2020-03-17 20:59:27 UTC  

and I have the right to believe what I want

2020-03-17 20:59:42 UTC  

Not in the eyes of God

2020-03-17 21:00:16 UTC  

please shut up

2020-03-17 21:00:27 UTC  

@Koninos third insult

2020-03-17 21:00:36 UTC  

just deport this guy already

2020-03-17 21:00:46 UTC  

no

2020-03-17 21:00:52 UTC  

your the general annyonace here\

2020-03-17 21:00:58 UTC  

deport him\

2020-03-17 21:00:59 UTC  

Did I break the rules?

2020-03-17 21:01:01 UTC  

Yes or no

2020-03-17 21:01:21 UTC  

Did i call someone an "egotistical asshole" and then told the opponent in my discussion to "shut up"?

2020-03-17 21:01:26 UTC  

Those things aren't allowed in serious channels

2020-03-17 21:01:48 UTC  

i have all moved on from a convo, yet you keep on latching on to it

2020-03-17 21:02:02 UTC  

I referenced it because it was remarkably relevant here

2020-03-17 21:02:39 UTC  

no it isnt

2020-03-17 21:02:49 UTC  

we had already moved on

2020-03-17 21:03:06 UTC  

I hadn't

2020-03-17 21:03:18 UTC  

Yes it is? Its relevant in that it shines light on the fact that whenever you lose an argument, instead of conceding and adjusting your world view in accordance with new evidence, you just "shrug it off"

2020-03-17 21:04:00 UTC  

please just deport him for 5 minutes

2020-03-17 21:04:24 UTC  

I didn't break rules

2020-03-17 21:04:25 UTC  

You did

2020-03-17 21:04:33 UTC  

You told him to shut up, and called me an egotistical asshole

2020-03-17 21:04:47 UTC  

AFTER already being warned for calling him a pedophile just because he was a catholic

2020-03-17 21:05:44 UTC  

there's more to moderation than that

2020-03-17 21:05:57 UTC  

No not really

2020-03-17 21:06:03 UTC  

The purpose of deporting is to punish

2020-03-17 21:06:08 UTC  

and you only punish people if they break rules

2020-03-17 21:12:39 UTC  

we had a discussion about the catholic church, towards the end it was clear that we were all getting annoyed, so our side agreed to just move on. he however, dug his feet in and refused to let the topic go. Even after we had moved on to a different topic. Additionally, once I had just agreed to one of his points so that he would just stop talking about it, he still persisted. Even when you agree with him he does not move on. I have seen this type of behavior from him before, in my moderation experience I believe it would of been benfitial to issue a short mute, just 2 or 3 minutes, this is so that hopefully the perpetrator will move onto to something else by the time the mute ends, and this gives time for the side that was being annoyed to move onto a new conversation and hopefully change the topic as a whole. Moderation is more than enforcing the rules, it is making sure that there is peace.

2020-03-17 21:14:12 UTC  

Do you think avoiding gish galloping is mutable?

2020-03-17 21:15:11 UTC  

Nor did you ever admit to agreeing with it, you offered a refutation, which I rebutted, and then you moved on without a word to slander.

2020-03-17 21:15:58 UTC  

im annoyed by you clearly

2020-03-17 21:16:09 UTC  

its best if you move on

2020-03-17 21:16:27 UTC  

that is unless you do want moderation action taken against you

2020-03-17 21:16:38 UTC  

On the grounds of what rule?

2020-03-17 21:16:42 UTC  

That assumes there will be any actions against him

2020-03-17 21:17:30 UTC  

moderation is more than just keeping the rules

2020-03-17 21:17:59 UTC  

Extra judicial moderation I would assume is discouraged, we have a very strict owner here

2020-03-17 21:18:07 UTC  

lets say you violated the no toxicity rule

2020-03-17 21:18:32 UTC  

I don't believe I've been disrespectful to you