The premises are entirely false from the terms and such

if he cannot actualize p1 he is not omnipotent

Did you just ignore me?

its not invalid

@Eoppa no.

you can’t be right wing and not believe in God

if you are then you’re just being edgy for attention

can god create something he cannot actualize?

> there is a potential p1 with a corresponding actual a1
What do you mean by this? There is simply something God can move?

@geer no. I've heard of right wing atheists, I still think the lot are disenfranchised deists.

no I mean I just think

they’re

edgy

> a1 has a potential p2 and p2 has a corresponding a2
This thing actualized this potential, but it only exists in the hierarchical series, nothing it does is without God.

like the communist antifa faggots

they use capitalist products every day

> like the communist antifa faggots
@geer you are?

they’re not real communists

No one is.

We have to do it, en mass.

communism is gay to begin with, but many people with weak spines will subscribe to ideologies that are taboo to seem interesting or better than someone else

yes is there some p1 that god can move to a1 @Eoppa

not actually following tenets of said ideology

@geer no.

rather just wearing its symbolism

Communism is pan

But everyone

can god create something he cannot actualize?

going from p1 to a1 would be the creation of that something

@Ater Votum death

the something he cannot move

communism is cringe bro, internationalism is evil

@Ater Votum ⚰

Sure, then this has no relevance to the argument

i.e. the p2 he cannot actualize to a2

@geer be local anarchist today

If you are positing "a stone that God cannot lift" it cannot even be created because there is no meaning

steal ur local wet floor sign

@Eoppa dearth ⚰

@geer yes. Take a pic and send it.

A dearth of meaning

@Eoppa a death of dream is what I'm reading, again.