Message from @geer

Discord ID: 694319831876370433


2020-03-30 22:56:45 UTC  

> like the communist antifa faggots
@geer you are?

2020-03-30 22:56:48 UTC  

they’re not real communists

2020-03-30 22:57:04 UTC  

No one is.

2020-03-30 22:57:26 UTC  

We have to do it, en mass.

2020-03-30 22:57:43 UTC  

communism is gay to begin with, but many people with weak spines will subscribe to ideologies that are taboo to seem interesting or better than someone else

2020-03-30 22:57:43 UTC  

yes is there some p1 that god can move to a1 @Eoppa

2020-03-30 22:57:55 UTC  

not actually following tenets of said ideology

2020-03-30 22:57:57 UTC  

@geer no.

2020-03-30 22:58:00 UTC  

rather just wearing its symbolism

2020-03-30 22:58:08 UTC  

Communism is pan

2020-03-30 22:58:14 UTC  

But everyone

2020-03-30 22:58:15 UTC  

can god create something he cannot actualize?

going from p1 to a1 would be the creation of that something

2020-03-30 22:58:24 UTC  
2020-03-30 22:58:26 UTC  

the something he cannot move

2020-03-30 22:58:33 UTC  

communism is cringe bro, internationalism is evil

2020-03-30 22:58:33 UTC  
2020-03-30 22:58:37 UTC  

Sure, then this has no relevance to the argument

2020-03-30 22:58:45 UTC  

i.e. the p2 he cannot actualize to a2

2020-03-30 22:58:50 UTC  

@geer be local anarchist today

2020-03-30 22:59:01 UTC  

If you are positing "a stone that God cannot lift" it cannot even be created because there is no meaning

2020-03-30 22:59:07 UTC  

steal ur local wet floor sign

2020-03-30 22:59:14 UTC  

@Eoppa dearth ⚰

2020-03-30 22:59:41 UTC  

@geer yes. Take a pic and send it.

2020-03-30 22:59:44 UTC  

A dearth of meaning

2020-03-30 23:00:06 UTC  

@Eoppa a death of dream is what I'm reading, again.

2020-03-30 23:00:33 UTC  

@Eoppa i see that, but if that is the case why do you keep avoiding my follow up question

2020-03-30 23:00:48 UTC  

but Why doesn't it have a meaning

2020-03-30 23:01:03 UTC  

Because it is death

2020-03-30 23:01:03 UTC  

What question? Can he actualize p1? I've already answered. There is no such potential

2020-03-30 23:01:13 UTC  

Because it's contradictory, I've explained

2020-03-30 23:01:39 UTC  

Sure Eoppa, what if you're wrong?

2020-03-30 23:01:46 UTC  

Then uhhhhhhh

2020-03-30 23:01:48 UTC  

yes but why is there no potential?

2020-03-30 23:02:00 UTC  

Because it's contradictory

2020-03-30 23:02:04 UTC  

There is no meaning

2020-03-30 23:02:12 UTC  

> because it is contradictory

2020-03-30 23:02:18 UTC  

@Ater Votum try again later.

2020-03-30 23:02:40 UTC  

why is it contradictory?

2020-03-30 23:02:58 UTC  

@Ater Votum my reactions of you not agreeing with me.

2020-03-30 23:03:15 UTC  

you haven't else i would've agreed with you or would have asked you a follow up question

2020-03-30 23:03:51 UTC  

Because question marks make things more certain, wouldn't you agree?