Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 662867048212332586
Ok here is the thing, what makes a country have unity? It is people thinking they have something in common, this can be genetics, it can also be what your favorite type of fruit is the seeking of unity can be achieved though people looking past there differences whatever those differences may be and though things people can unite around, I see no reason a nation can't be centered on an ideal such as a USA for unity instead of "well for the last few thousand years we only have had a society based on this genetic code"
What defines a country’s unity is Nationalism. You cannot have unity without Nationalism.
Uh
I mean I think nationalism is more of a bi-product
And Nationalism is defined by one of two things, support for your nation or support for your race.
The US was founded on a nationalistic interpretation of the Constitution: the Jeffersonian-Republican model of government proved too bureacratic and dividing and almost plunged the Thirteen Colonies into anarchy.
^
@Chief Rocket Designer men can change their ideals, their offspring can reject them. These things can occur. But this cannot happen if it is based upon ethnicity. Of course stuff like nationalism, common culture and language add to the unity as well and should be there.
The Federalists decided upon a centralized government that ultimately vested power in the nation; nationalism was a key factor in this idea.
For the most part the Jews and Liberals have made ethnic europeans despise themselves. It is only with new generations can you see this hate fading.
@Chief Rocket Designer the US stopped working after they let in more non-whites and gave them equal rights.
Rest in peace, elstner
Humans can change there ideals yes and there offspring can reject them, but if you disagree with people of your ethnicity on everything except that it will not be strong enough to hold unity if the differences are great enough
@Chief Rocket Designer true. That would undermine unity quite a little. But that very rarely happens. If it does it is usually split between two sides. One side wins and the nation moves on. Say you base your country off a flawed system, and then it is proven to be so. The country would just break apart...it wouldn't last the changing of the tides
It would decend into the same type of warfare your society would
You could just adopt the method of government of what Spain did: unitary government with asymmetrical devolution.
if the warfare was a stalemate
then it was a stalemate
same thing
@Chief Rocket Designer What your talking about is the commercial revenue interests evolved to trump the interests of nation, tribe, clan and family.
Don’t even get me started on the absurdity of the globalist, postmodernist argument.
If you need to see an example of commercial revenue interests, see Monsanto and farmers in India.
With their seed products.
what
When dafaq did I even mention economics
I am saying that your family, your tribe and your clan should be based on more than your damn genetics
@Chief Rocket Designer what did you mean before
if you just said nationalism is the male reproductive strategy and globalism is the female (reproductive strategy then that would be the most reductive method of expressing the truth. And that nationalism in the current case is yes an instance of the male reproductive strategy.
What political ideology do you people even subscribe to?
@Deleted User British Fascism
Clerical Fascism.
I am saying that civil war will always either result in reunification or the non-existence of a state
@Chief Rocket Designer Well what are you?
@Leto Atreides II And you?
minarchism
@Ater Votum How does that claim on reproductive strategy make any sense
@Chief Rocket Designer it's possible that a civil war could lead to no state. But down the road things would re unify. Germany wouldn't have re unified if their whole concept of unity was based of ideas.
@Deleted User Libertarian with some limited SocDem policies