hence not making them slavic

As you wish, adult. Bosnians mixed with Albanians and Turks more because they were and still are, muslims. Serbians and Croatians mixed more with other Southern Slavs, Italians and Greeks. Therefore, religion played a huge role into the genetic development of 21st century Southern Slavs. So yes, they are darker than the average Slavic person, congratulations. That doesn't mean that Bosniaks aren't Slavs. After all, today, all of us are mixed, and especially the people originating from the Balkans.

Also as I mentioned before, it's not only your DNA which makes you a Slav.

Everything except the last 2 sentences was irrelevant there. You like to talk in paragraphs while not conveying a single coherent point, i see

I'll take a bath and brb

Yeah okay cool argument yes.

What was the cause of the genetic development is irrelevant to the genetic development

Bosniaks being mixed with turks and some western europeans, does in fact mean they aren't slavs, since their genetic make up is not in line with the general genetic make up of a slav

Let it be a serb, croat, macedonian, or a russian

"A Y chromosome haplogroups study published in 2005 found that "three main groups of Bosnia-Herzegovina, in spite of some quantitative differences, share a large fraction of the same ancient gene pool distinctive for the Balkan area". The study did however find that Serbs and Bosniaks are genetically closer to each other than either of them is to Croats.[1]"

it was literally a single google away

As I have said multiple times, but you keep omitting it, **being a Slav doesn't mean having a specific genetic status,** because Slavs are Indo-European people who speak the many Slavic languages of the larger Balto-Slavic linguistic group. The Bosnians do belong on this group. After all, here's a map of all the officially recognized Slavic countries:

So even if the Bosniak genetic status is unaligned with the Serbian and Croatian one, that doesn't mean they're not Slavs.

Well I obviously disagree

Slav is a genetic status

Not one which is constituted by language or culture

And one tiny correction of a huge mistake of yours: Macedonians aren't Slavs - perhaps you're referring to the Vulgarians living in Northern Macedonia.

Well if we have different interpretations of what a Slav is in the first place, this conversation can't really go anywhere. Not that I expected it to go somewhere, after all.

And as I mentioned earlier, sure, to be a Slav you have to be white and such, an African American can't randomly declare himself a Slav because he knows how to speak Russian... But it's PARTIALLY dependant on biological and physical status.

any people in here that like bloomberg

no one

nigga is rigging his way to top

@Bkoolis

Bloomberg is just rich

fr

like isn’t it wrong to boo someone who says “all lives matter”

and then apologize and be like sry niggas

all of time is now and you are entire humanity https://youtu.be/4JOfr-NgIzs

i need the pic of the siege dude in front of a power plant

We are headed and have been headed on a path of eventually no one owning anything

With everything being as a service or on-demand

Techno-Communism?

I read a while back that there are people in CA that rent everything and own nothing but their toothbrush.
For some reason they're proud of it

It's not really communism because you still have to pay to rent everything.
I think it's closer to those early Industrial Revolution towns where the company owns everything

@Ronin Perhaps.

Communism isn't "you don't have to pay for anything" btw

Not even close

Only unintelligible fools thing that communism means free everything

The difference is also that communism is forced yet nobody is forcing you to rent everything.