Message from @SavvyPun
Discord ID: 681259008207880234
It's absolutely not primitive. Working with natural structural stone there has to be several specialists on site.
no shit
nobody is saying that cavemen built the stonehenge
It's the most pains taking art form in construction
okay
It's not primitive
it is
It's the most advanced
it's definitely not the most advanced, lol
If it's so primitive then why don't slaves have rock houses instead of the rich?
what
Exactly
no i don't understand you
It is the most costly form of construction
yes it is
doesn't mean it's advanced
Even steel and glass is cheaper
that's why stonehenge is the best thing these people built
yes and they didn't know how to make steel
not sure about glass
okay, they didn't know how to make steel
that's what i said
Oh but they did
usage of iron as a primary metal came to britain and ireland between 600BC to 400BC
stonehenge is much older
I'm sure they made clay weapons
no, they made weapons first out of copper, then bronze, and finally switched to iron
in different periods of time
Who says?
they also probably mined tin over in britain
archaeological findings
Iron will rust away
so what if it rusts away
what does that have to do with anything
They only find weapons that was made that don't rust away
are you gonna say that they didn't use iron in the middle ages?
you're gonna tell me iron swords don't exist?
lol
Just because they don't dig up 1000 year old steel, doesn't mean they didn't use it
it kind of does