There's nothing primitive about it

compared to what we can do it's primitive

Hammer and nails is primitive compared to that

if hammer and nails is advanced in your mind then i can see how you're flabbergasted by this

It's absolutely not primitive. Working with natural structural stone there has to be several specialists on site.

no shit

nobody is saying that cavemen built the stonehenge

It's the most pains taking art form in construction

okay

It's not primitive

it is

It's the most advanced

it's definitely not the most advanced, lol

If it's so primitive then why don't slaves have rock houses instead of the rich?

what

Exactly

no i don't understand you

It is the most costly form of construction

yes it is

doesn't mean it's advanced

Even steel and glass is cheaper

that's why stonehenge is the best thing these people built

yes and they didn't know how to make steel

not sure about glass

Oh it absolutely is far more complex than steel

okay, they didn't know how to make steel

that's what i said

Oh but they did

usage of iron as a primary metal came to britain and ireland between 600BC to 400BC

stonehenge is much older

I'm sure they made clay weapons

no, they made weapons first out of copper, then bronze, and finally switched to iron

in different periods of time

Who says?

they also probably mined tin over in britain

archaeological findings

Iron will rust away

so what if it rusts away

what does that have to do with anything

They only find weapons that was made that don't rust away

are you gonna say that they didn't use iron in the middle ages?