No, my criticism is that in the system of constitutional monarchy, the checks and balances aren't too clearly defined. As in the British monarchy, the Crown gives the "final stamp of approval" and has on paper, the right to say no or revise as such with the election of a prime minister where the crown can just deny. But, parliament itself being a problem leads to the same issues as what plagues republics and ancient China, with factions struggling to manipulate the Crown and public to get their way.
